This paper examines Nat Brown's narrative history, The Town That Started the Civil War, which chronicles the 1858 Oberlin-Wellington rescue of John Price, a fugitive slave recaptured under the federal Fugitive Slave Act. The paper summarizes the key events surrounding the rescue, discusses Brown's openly partisan perspective — evident in his characterization of participants as "rescuers," "unsung heroes," and "betrayers" — and evaluates what the incident reveals about growing Northern resistance to pro-slavery federal legislation. The paper argues that the willingness of Ohio citizens to defy the law and face criminal prosecution signaled a broader Northern resolve that contributed to the sectional tensions preceding the Civil War.
In the years prior to the American Civil War, there were many incidents of conflict between the Abolitionists — the anti-slavery forces — and pro-slavery forces throughout the country. While everyone has heard of "Bleeding Kansas" and John Brown's raid on Harpers Ferry, not many have heard of the other incidents that led up to the Civil War. Nat Brown, in his book The Town That Started the Civil War, describes in detail one of these events: the Oberlin-Wellington rescue of a fugitive slave. In this incident, a fugitive slave had been recaptured in accordance with the federal Fugitive Slave Act, but the residents of Oberlin and Wellington, Ohio rose up and rescued the former slave from the clutches of the "slave catchers." As a result, dozens of citizens were arrested and indicted, while two were actually put on trial and found guilty. However, the fact that the Abolitionists were willing to break the law and use whatever means were necessary to free the escaped slave was an indication that Northerners were willing to fight for their beliefs.
For many years, those in the South who supported slavery constantly threatened to use violence and even to secede from the Union over the issue of slavery. During the 1850s, pro-slavery supporters had flooded into Kansas and violently clashed with anti-slavery supporters. Many in the North were tired of pro-slavery forces always getting their way.
The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 was another irritant to the Abolitionists, as it required slaves who had escaped from the South and fled to non-slave states in the North to be captured and returned to their former masters. Many Northerners viewed this as an attack on their right to outlaw the institution of slavery within their own states. If former slaves could be apprehended and returned to the South without a proper trial, then the Northern states' laws banning slavery were effectively worthless. Any Black person could be seized and sent off to be enslaved in the South.
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.