This paper examines a quantitative study investigating whether nurse staffing levels affect the deviation of a patient's length of stay (LOS) from the expected length of stay in a hospital setting. The study considers independent variables including hours per patient day (HPPD), skill mix as defined by the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI), and nurse expertise. Drawing on prior literature linking higher staffing to reduced patient complications and lower mortality rates, the paper outlines the study's hypothesis, theoretical and conceptual framework, research design, and validity considerations. The analysis argues that adequate nurse staffing may actually reduce hospital costs by shortening patient stays, countering the common administrative assumption that reducing nursing staff is a straightforward cost-cutting measure.
The number of nurses on staff at any particular time has an impact on a patient's expected length of stay (LOS). This study was conducted to resolve the question of how much impact, if any, is produced by having more or fewer nurses on staff. The question is important to the field of nursing because many hospitals are currently seeking to cut costs, and one area that administrators are targeting is the number of nurses on staff at any given time. Other studies have shown that this cost-cutting approach can actually backfire: the end result is often a longer average LOS, which costs the hospital additional money rather than saving it.
The purpose of the study is to determine whether the level of nurse staffing affects the deviation of a patient's length of stay from the expected length of stay, and to what degree. The study also aims to verify previous research findings that nursing care levels are a factor in the average length of stay for various patient populations.
The research question is whether a higher level of staffing would positively affect the deviation from a patient's expected length of stay, and, if so, whether reducing the number of nurses on staff would have a negative effect on that same deviation.
Some experts argue that the global economy has placed enormous pressure on institutions to cut costs, and this is particularly true in an industry like healthcare, which has seen rising costs for decades. Many hospital administrators face the challenge of determining where to reduce expenses, and nursing staff numbers are a likely target. The common assumption is that fewer nurses can still manage the same workload and care for the same number of patients. What is often overlooked is that a higher number of nurses may enable patients to receive more attentive and better-quality care, resulting in shorter-than-expected hospital stays — which would itself reduce costs.
The study's hypothesis is that "greater nurse staffing, as measured by HPPD, skill mix, and expertise will be associated with a higher deviation from expected LOS (i.e., the patient will be discharged sooner than expected)" (p. 157).
The study's variables include the relationship between various nursing staff levels and both the length of stay and deviations from the expected length of stay. The independent variable is the staffing level at various points in time. This independent variable is then measured to determine the dependent variable: the deviation from the expected length of stay.
Additional independent variables were measured in relation to the care provided by nursing staff. These included the skill mix of nurses as defined by the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators (NDNQI), the overall skill mix of the nursing staff, and individual nurse expertise.
"Cost theory and structure-outcome conceptual model"
"Prior studies linking staffing to patient outcomes"
"Quantitative design, criteria, and validity threats"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.