This paper examines how the national governments of the United Kingdom and the United States define and measure teacher quality through formal standards and assessment frameworks. It outlines how U.S. states use Council of Chief State School Officers standards and National Board assessments, including video-recorded lessons and written lesson plans, to evaluate new teachers. It contrasts this with the UK's Teaching Excellence Framework, which assesses performance against defined standards. The paper also considers how government investment in education — from funding research to supporting student access — benefits both institutions of higher education and broader society, generating economic and social returns that justify continued public spending on quality education.
For teaching to be effective, the knowledge attained — or the learning acquired — by the student must be meaningfully enhanced. Effective teaching describes the attributes and practices of teachers that promote subject-matter learning and the achievement of established objectives. It encompasses curriculum development, classroom delivery, and the oversight of student work. Because it covers such a wide scope, the effectiveness of teaching cannot be measured by any single method. Several tools are used, however, including self-review, student ratings of teachers, student performance outcomes, and peer evaluations (OID, 2013). Understanding how national governments define and operationalize these measures is essential for setting meaningful teaching quality standards.
In the United States, standards were developed that must be met by individuals seeking initial teaching licenses. These standards incorporate both the professional requirements for teaching and the competencies considered necessary for effective student learning. They were developed by individual states under the guidance of the Council of Chief State School Officers. These standards are widely respected and have been adopted in over 40 states.
National Board assessments are used to evaluate the practice of new teachers in many states, and these assessment standards inform the decision about whether a teacher who has completed an induction period should progress to the probationary stage. States that have adopted these assessments include California, Colorado, Oregon, and Connecticut. Assessors require teachers to record their classroom instruction on video and to submit written lesson plans. These materials are then analyzed and rated against standards considered to represent acceptable and desired performance (Darling-Hammond, 2010).
In the United Kingdom, a Teaching Excellence Framework is used. This framework encompasses various levels of assessment, including evaluating institutional needs, defining desired standards for education, and specifying the practices to be adopted in teaching, among other features. Teachers are assessed on the basis of performance outcomes; no framework, however, can directly assess teachers at the moment of actual instruction (Henehan, 2015).
"How government funding supports universities and students"
"Social returns from public investment in education"
Mitra, D. (n.d.). Pennsylvania's best investment: The social and economic benefits of public education. Pennsylvania.
OID. (2013). Measuring & evaluating teaching. UCLA Office of Instructional Development.
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.