This paper examines a workplace scenario in which a newly appointed, relatively young project manager named Tim struggles to motivate an experienced, entrenched team whose members are at the top of their pay grades and resistant to change. Drawing on concepts of servant leadership, team-building, and goal setting, the paper identifies three core deficiencies — leadership credibility, team cohesion, and management support — and offers practical recommendations for addressing each. It also critiques the passive organizational culture that complicates Tim's efforts and concludes that HR involvement and structured facilitation are essential for sustainable improvement.
Tim recently changed jobs to work for a company as a project manager. While he was initially excited about the opportunity, he grew uncertain and made an appointment to speak with the Director of Project Management. Tim expressed his concerns about motivating his team and cited several examples showing that work was not his team members' top priority. The Director tried to help Tim understand that the average age in Project Management was 46, that most employees were set in their ways, and that many might resent Tim's relatively young age (30) and lack of experience.
It is clear that Tim has a problem within his department and with his management style in relation to the employee base. Three important skills are currently lacking: team-building, leadership, and support building.
Being a leader and being a manager are two different skills. Although the terms are sometimes used interchangeably, a leader is essentially a strategic coach and guide, while a manager "manages" tactics. Tim's department needs both. To win over his department, he needs to ensure that employees understand his competence while also recognizing his accountability for key decisions. At present, his employees do not trust him, nor do they see any reason to change their behaviors.
There is currently no team spirit, no team goals, and no sense of collective identity among Tim's staff. Workers may be at the top of their pay scale and are thus no longer motivated by salary. The key issue in Tim's department appears to center on motivation and the absence of a team atmosphere — one that Tim must actively encourage by providing opportunities and motivating his staff.
Because the team does not know or trust Tim, it is difficult for him to build support. Employees have become patterned in their behaviors and responses to management, settling into a rut that is both self-sabotaging and unproductive. Tim must learn how to build support, find common ground, and communicate his vision for the department through a clear strategic and tactical plan.
The support Tim has received thus far seems passive rather than helpful and dynamic. Comments from the Director of Project Management reflect a company culture that is not oriented toward growth and change:
"Realize that in a project environment, people think that they come first and that the project is second. This is a way of life in our organization."
"They're set in their ways… some of our people may just resent seeing a thirty-year-old project manager."
"Many of our people are at the top of their pay grades and have no place to go. They must look elsewhere for interests."
These statements suggest that the organization itself has normalized low engagement and resistance to new leadership, which compounds Tim's challenge significantly.
Tim's first task is to reinvent the department. This will take time and require considerable extra effort initially. Tim must build trust, lead by example, be willing to get his hands dirty, and demonstrate to his team that he values them collectively while also possessing the expertise his title demands. Although the full demographics and psychographics of his department are unknown, Tim must visibly support diversity and create an inclusive work environment. He can accomplish this through department meetings, group projects, individual check-ins, and by identifying motivators beyond salary — such as event tickets, additional time off, or friendly competitions.
Tim's authority as a leader does not need to be coercive. A servant leadership style — one in which Tim inspires and leads by example — is more appropriate here. This form of leadership acknowledges competition and constructive conflict, which is not inherently negative because it surfaces alternative viewpoints that might otherwise go unheard. Research shows that moral identity contributes to leadership acumen and vice versa. The identity of the leader's expected role within an organization shapes the manner in which moral and ethical frameworks can be applied to decision-making (Baldoni, 2008).
"Cross-functional teams and performance incentives suggested"
"Goal setting as foundation for team cohesion and direction"
For Tim to have any chance of success with his department, he needs to enlist the support of Human Resources. Basic group and team-building exercises are essential, and a trained facilitator who can help redefine and develop the process of teamwork will be vital to Tim's forward progress. Without this structural support, Tim risks addressing symptoms rather than root causes, and the department's entrenched patterns are unlikely to shift through individual effort alone.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.