This paper explores the role of Canada's First Nations — particularly the Iroquois — as a lens through which to analyze French and English colonial histories. It examines strategic alliances forged through the fur trade, the Jesuit missionary project, and the patriarchal norms imposed on Indigenous communities. Drawing on historians such as Bothwell, Greer, Mann, and Trigger, the paper argues that the European cultural superiority and xenophobia underlying French colonial policy in New France persists in contemporary French domestic policy toward Muslim minorities. Issues of citizenship, gender, and cultural hegemony connect seventeenth-century colonial practices to modern political debates over religious expression in France.
As Bothwell points out, "Canada's Native peoples have always been and are still a crucial component in any analysis of the relations between English and French," providing a lens by which to view the entirety of Canadian history.
Not only do Native peoples provide the historical means to critically analyze the dual histories of Canada — the history of encounter between Canada's First Nations and the European conquerors also reveals striking similarities between the cultures of the oppressors: the English and the French.
The Iroquois resistance movements gave rise to formative struggles that distinguished French from English settlements. The strategic alliances formed between Native and European communities promoted the political interests of each. However, the Iroquois resistance movement also reveals a common trend in European post-colonial hegemony that persists into the twenty-first century. It is therefore worth drawing parallels between the French treatment of the Iroquois during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries and the modern French treatment of North African immigrants and its growing Muslim minorities. Issues of citizenship become central to the argument that France demonstrates similar sociological stances in its treatment of non-Christian minorities today as it did in the seventeenth century.
Formal religious institutions played a major role in the creation and maintenance of cultural hegemony throughout North America's history. The Catholic and Anglican Churches, the Jesuits, and other religious organizations viewed their roles as preservers of moral, intellectual, social, and spiritual righteousness. As Mann puts it, in the seventeenth century "came the most extraordinary group of hard-nosed religious zealots: mystics who knew how to run a business… They saw New France in their dreams and speculated about a new Christian race composed of French and Indians."
Beginning this new "Christian race" depended on breaking ties with the old country and resettling in the new. However, the New World settlement never did become the "New Kingdom" that the missionaries envisioned.
Culture clashes between the English and the French seemed ironically more acute than those between the French and Canada's indigenous peoples. The reason for the strategic alliances formed between the French and the Native peoples almost always depended on sound business sense. The fur trade provided tremendous impetus for peace treaties on both sides. For French settlers, the fur trade made their religious goals possible. For the Native peoples, the fur trade facilitated the political goals of rival tribes and enforced existing power hierarchies among the various First Nations.
When England began encroaching on established French trade routes and relationships, the first seeds of warfare began to bloom profusely. Frontenac's programs of westward expansion, coupled with new problems arising from the Iroquois treaty, made France's program of New World colonization increasingly difficult. The Iroquois raid in 1689 on Lachine near Montreal, for example, "led to a new round of conflict between the French and the Iroquois and their allies, the English colonies."
In the late seventeenth century, Jesuit priests fomented greater strife among the Iroquois and helped wreak havoc on the Iroquois Confederacy and its tentative peace.
Greer highlights some of the key sociological differences between Iroquois and French settlers that may have also fomented strife. For example, the Iroquois "gender regime stands in basic contrast with that of the French, for it was not patriarchal."
Even among Iroquois who had converted to Christianity, gender parity and the political, economic, and social empowerment of women remained commonplace — a fact that irked the Jesuits. "Christianity had surprisingly little effect on Iroquois sexual equality. In some of their earliest missionary efforts in Canada, the Jesuits did their best to enforce patriarchal norms, encouraging parents to beat their children, humiliating 'rebellious' wives, and trying to get men to dominate their families."
The efforts did not pay off entirely, but patriarchy was nonetheless a well-established political, economic, and social institution in the colonies. All of the inherent problems with colonialism and patriarchy caused New France to be in a "precarious" situation.
"Erasure of Indigenous historical agency by European colonizers"
"Links between colonial hegemony and modern French minority policy"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.