This paper evaluates Mikhail Gorbachev, the final leader of the Soviet Union (1985–1991), against J. Thomas Wren's framework of six essential leadership characteristics: drive, leadership motivation, honesty, integrity, self-confidence, and cognitive ability combined with organizational knowledge. The analysis demonstrates that Gorbachev exhibited all six traits, particularly through his commitment to glasnost, perestroika, and uskoreniye reforms. The paper concludes that Gorbachev's leadership style resembles that of an orchestral conductor—one who empowers diverse talent to work together toward a common goal. While Gorbachev's reforms ultimately contributed to the Soviet Union's dissolution, his approach emphasized respect and delegation over fear and control, marking a significant departure from previous Soviet leadership models.
According to The Leaders Companion: Insights on Leadership throughout the Ages by J. Thomas Wren, a leader is identified as portraying various personal traits. Wren identifies six specific traits that research has shown to have a strong correlation with effective leadership. These six characteristics include drive, leadership motivation, honesty, integrity, self-confidence, and cognitive ability combined with significant business, industrial, or organizational knowledge.
The individual selected for evaluation as a leader, in accordance with the traits offered by Wren, is Mikhail Gorbachev. Gorbachev was the last leader of the Soviet Union, taking office in 1985 and serving through the country's collapse in 1991. Unlike other Soviet leaders before him, Gorbachev was not a member of communist institutions such as the KGB. This difference greatly affected his leadership style, which can best be summarized as empowering the people rather than ruling them. Thus, his leadership style tended to create followers through respect instead of through fear.
Further, unlike other Soviet leaders, Gorbachev traveled extensively abroad before becoming leader, which significantly affected his future political and social views. As a powerful and controversial figure in twentieth-century history, Mikhail Gorbachev provides an interesting case study for understanding Wren's trademark characteristics of effective leadership. The result of Gorbachev's liberal political approach was twofold: on one hand, it created more freedoms and democracy in the USSR and its Eastern bloc countries. On the other hand, these same liberal social and economic policies brought the government to the brink of disaster and ultimately led to the state's dissolution.
When examining a world leader through Wren's leadership framework, it becomes clear that any leader who exhibits a combination of these traits can be regarded as successful. The fundamental difference between Gorbachev and other Soviet leaders lies in his willingness to get directly involved in policy and reform, rather than ruling through intimidation and control.
If a leader is clearly driven and has leadership motivation—as evidenced by leading by example—that leader is exhibiting the characteristics necessary for success. Gorbachev demonstrated this quality and thus gained a substantial following. In contrast, a leader who is unwilling to get directly involved in policy is most likely not going to be a successful leader. This fundamental difference distinguishes Gorbachev from the other Soviet leaders who preceded him.
Further, if a leader is honest and has high respect from his or her citizens, this strategy of honesty gives them integrity and thus makes them most likely to experience success as a government leader. A leader can also be clearly assessed by his or her ability to function in a complex, high-tech based industry, and who possesses both the cognitive ability and industry knowledge needed to be a successful leader within his domain. Finally, a strategy of delegation demonstrates a business or government leader's self-confidence in the training and capability of his or her employees.
"Application of Wren's traits to Gorbachev's reforms"
"Gorbachev's delegation and empowerment approach"
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.