This reaction paper examines three scholarly articles addressing the intersecting themes of family, careers, and marriage. The first article, by Korenman and Neumark, investigates whether marriage increases men's productivity and wages. The second, by Claudia Goldin, traces how career and family goals among college-educated women evolved across five cohorts spanning the twentieth century. The third, by Budig and England, analyzes the wage penalty associated with motherhood. The paper reflects on each study's findings and raises broader societal questions about how these three phenomena — the marriage wage premium, shifting female ambitions, and maternal career interruptions — are interrelated.
The topics of family, careers, and marriage are ones that individuals from all walks of life encounter on a somewhat daily basis. Through three scholarly articles, researchers provide interesting insight into specific areas within this broader subject. Each study approaches the topic from a different angle — examining men's wages, women's long-term goals, and the economic consequences of motherhood — yet together they paint a rich picture of how work and family life intersect.
Korenman and Neumark's paper, Does Marriage Really Make Men More Productive?, provides interesting insight into how marriage correlates with increased salary among white males. Korenman and Neumark explore how married workers tended to "receive higher performance ratings than single men; as a result, they were likely to be promoted" (Korenman and Neumark). Using human capital wage equations, the scholars examined data that led them to conclude that married men had higher salaries overall.
One of the more interesting conclusions Korenman and Neumark reach concerns never-married men — specifically, that there is "faster wage growth for married men as compared to never married men, then from an intercept shift associated with any particular marital status" (Korenman and Neumark). This conclusion is notable in that, while the finding itself is clear, the authors offer little substantive explanation for why it is occurring.
Does marriage really help men be more productive? It seems that marriage brings added responsibility to one's life, and the desire to move forward and ultimately earn more money to provide for a household subtly pushes married men in that direction. There appear to be a range of factors holding single men back from advancing along the salary ladder more quickly, and it seems, mostly, that single men do not feel the need as urgently as married men do. With added personal responsibility, it seems logical that one's professional life must also advance in parallel. For instance, if a married man were advancing professionally at a single man's rate while his personal life was growing — acquiring a house, having children — that personal life could easily go off track for lack of sufficient financial support.
Further insight into the broader realm of family, marriage, and careers is provided by Claudia Goldin in The Long Road to the Fast Track: Career and Family. This article offers a fascinating look at how career and family goals have changed among women college graduates over the last century or so. Goldin identifies five cohorts of college-educated women: those who graduated between 1900 and 1920 and chose either "a family or career"; a second cohort graduating from 1920 to 1945 who pursued "a job then family"; a third cohort graduating from 1946 to the 1960s who followed "a family then job" path; a fourth group graduating from the 1960s to the 1980s whose goals included pursuing a career before raising a family; and finally those graduating from 1980 to 1990, whose goals had become "career then family" (Goldin).
Goldin attributes some of this change to the labor market, including "the growth of a wide variety of white collar jobs" (Goldin). However, upon reviewing the material, the transformation seems stronger than the labor market alone can explain. The changes in ideology and perspective among college-educated women appear to flow from within society itself and from the evolving social norms that accompanied each successive generation.
Was it possible that, between 1920 and 1945, men were at war and women had to take jobs rather than remain at home? Did women subsequently gain greater momentum in the workplace and begin taking education more seriously? Perhaps daughters of earlier graduates who regretted forgoing a career pushed their own children to take professional ambitions more seriously. Whatever the cause, the questions must be explored further. Goldin's article, though fascinating, leaves many questions unanswered and leaves much to be desired in terms of the depth of her data. The shifts seen in college-educated women's career and family goals may serve as a macrocosm for something larger happening in society — but precisely what remains an open question.
"Motherhood reduces women's hourly pay"
"Cross-cutting questions linking all three studies"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.