This case study examines the discipline referral process for a seventh-grade student, "Gary," whose behavior has progressively escalated from tardiness and bullying to violent incidents in school. The paper documents repeated interventions, counseling attempts, and the application of the district's progressive infraction levels before recommending suspension. The author considers whether the student requires psychological support alongside disciplinary action and reflects on how managing challenging behavior affects school unity and staff collaboration.
A seventh grader named "Gary" (not his real name) has been in trouble with teachers and administrators over the past year and a half. He is tardy constantly, frequently truant, and when present at school, he engages in bullying behavior, disrupts classes, and makes inappropriate comments to girls. His most recent incident occurred in the lunchroom when he started a fight with another student, then grabbed several lunch trays belonging to younger, smaller students and threw their food on the floor.
When a supervising teacher attempted to intervene and escort him to the principal's office, Gary spat on the teacher and used profanity. During this episode, he exhibited signs of physical distress—shaking and sweating—that resembled a mild seizure. A consultation with the school nurse revealed no history of seizures or current medication. Witnesses reported that Gary had taken two hard blows to the head during the fight before escaping from the other student. His extreme reaction appeared to stem from genuine upset related to the physical altercation rather than any underlying medical condition.
When a student acts out violently, it is the responsibility of the nearest teacher to intervene when possible. The Citywide Standards of Intervention and Discipline Measures specify that if school officials suspect a student's problems result from "a disability which may require special education services," that student should be referred to the Committee on Special Education. While Gary's underlying issues may not yet be fully understood, current evidence does not indicate that he qualifies for special education services.
The standards also mandate that parents be notified when a child exhibits serious behavioral problems and disrupts the normal flow of school activities. In Gary's case, his behavior has been characterized to him as follows:
After exhausting reasonable interventions through guidance counseling and parental notification, it became apparent that more stringent measures were necessary.
Before recommending suspension, several factors were considered in accordance with district policy: Gary's age and maturity level, his lengthy disciplinary record, the severity of his poor conduct, the clear circumstances of his disruptive behavior, and the unacceptable frequency of his misbehavior.
A behavioral intervention plan was implemented for Gary, but he appeared indifferent to attempts at redirection and civil dialogue. His progression through the district's Progressive Infraction Levels demonstrates the systematic escalation of his conduct:
This progression shows that Gary has not responded to interventions at any stage and continues to escalate. His trajectory indicates that typical classroom management and counseling strategies have been ineffective.
"Suspension options and recommendation for psychological support"
"Student's failing grades and disruption of classroom learning"
"Staff cohesion and institutional perspective on discipline"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.