This paper examines a co-teaching conflict between two educators — Audrey, a veteran teacher of twenty years, and Betty, her newer co-teaching partner. It analyzes the sources of tension, including classroom organization habits and unequal attention to accelerated versus special needs students, and proposes practical strategies for resolution. The paper recommends open communication, after-hours meetings, possible mediation by school administrators, and differentiated instructional approaches such as tiered assignments. The analysis argues that both teachers possess complementary strengths and that, with deliberate collaboration, they can create an inclusive classroom environment that serves all learners effectively.
Audrey's complaints and problems were due largely to her unfamiliarity with co-teaching — with sharing her classroom with another educator. For someone who had worked alone for twenty years, sharing a classroom involved as many adjustments as entering into any new relationship. Therefore, both Betty and Audrey needed to communicate, collaborate, and cooperate. They needed to discuss their needs and concerns with each other to avoid growing difficulties and resentments, because ultimately the two teachers had the potential to work well together and complement each other in the classroom. Both teachers were adept at working with students with special needs: Audrey was simply more concerned about gifted students than Betty was, and vice versa.
Among Audrey's main grievances were Betty's teaching habits, rather than her teaching approach. In other words, Audrey was not disappointed with Betty's ability as a teacher. In fact, she was delighted by Betty's performance and her ability to assist students with special needs. What Audrey was concerned about was keeping the classroom well-organized and neat. Her second concern regarded the accelerated students, whom Audrey felt were being shortchanged by the amount of attention paid to the special needs students.
Although Audrey benefited greatly from the co-teaching training course, she was not fully prepared for the nuances of sharing her classroom. One of the first steps she could have taken would have been to meet privately after hours with Betty to discuss matters related to classroom management and organization. Just as one would with a new roommate, Audrey also needed to make some compromises of her own — such as accepting a few untidy desks in exchange for a harmonious co-teaching relationship. Having to wipe the blackboard clean every morning is not a major issue, and it is one that Audrey could learn to accept in exchange for a skilled and effective co-teacher.
Among the practical steps available to both educators was the option of involving other educational professionals. If the two teachers met after hours — perhaps with colleagues acting as advisors or mediators — they might have been able to resolve tensions more quickly. Intervention on the part of administrators such as school principals might also have helped facilitate productive dialogue. In short, Audrey and Betty needed to talk openly about their concerns so that they could reach a consensus about how to run their shared classroom.
"Balancing attention between accelerated and special needs students"
"Tiered assignments and differentiated curricula for all learners"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.