This paper examines sport-related films with a focus on the 1981 British film Chariots of Fire and its significance within the genre. It briefly traces the genre's origins to the 1971 telefilm Brian's Song before analyzing Chariots of Fire in depth. The paper explores the film's central characters — Eric Liddell and Harold Abrahams — and the personal, religious, and social conflicts each faced on their way to the 1924 Paris Olympics. It also evaluates the film's aesthetic appeal, critical reception, and cinematographic techniques, including the use of slow motion, objective camera angles, and high-key tonality.
Brian's Song was released in 1971 and is still considered one of the finest telefilms ever made in the sport film genre. It was first broadcast on ABC and later shown in theaters across the country. The film was significant in many ways: it effectively created the sport film genre and its runaway success encouraged many directors and actors to produce more films of this kind. In many respects, it was the first of its kind to tap into the contemporary culture and way of life of American society in the early 1970s, opening the public's eyes to the potential of sport-related films. Brian's Song is widely credited as laying the groundwork for numerous box-office hits in the sport film genre, and this enduring influence makes it a historically significant work.
Chariots of Fire is a British film in the sport genre that won numerous awards. The story revolves around two athletes who compete in the 1924 Paris Olympics. Eric Liddell is a devout Christian born to Scottish parents who served as missionaries in China. He wanted to win a medal to honor God, feeling a divine inspiration in his athletic pursuit before returning to missionary work. The film's other central character is Harold Abrahams, a Jewish man who wanted to win a medal in order to overcome the prejudice he faced in British society.
Both athletes compete at the 1924 Olympics in Paris. After many obstacles, Abrahams wins the 100-meter race while Liddell wins the 400-meter race. The film ends on a hopeful note, with a closing title card revealing that Abrahams married his girlfriend Sybil and became a statesman of British athletics, while Liddell worked as a missionary in China until his death in 1945.
Several forms of conflict are evident throughout the film. Liddell experiences conflict with both his sister and the church he represents. When he is unable to attend Sunday church services due to his athletic commitments, his sister and others reproach him for neglecting his faith. Against this opposition, Liddell pursues his dream because he believes he is running for God and finds divine inspiration in his mission. This represents a conflict between an individual and a religious institution.
The second major conflict involves Abrahams, who runs to counter the social prejudice he faces as a Jewish man. This is a clear case of individual versus society. His victory in the race earns him wide popularity and helps him overcome those prejudices, ultimately securing him a respected position in British athletics.
A further instance of individual-versus-society conflict occurs when Liddell refuses to run the 100-meter race because it is scheduled on a Sunday — the Sabbath. His refusal to participate, despite intense pressure from the British Olympic Committee and the Prince of Wales, makes national headlines. In both conflicts, the athletes' strength of will enables them to overcome the obstacles they face. As the film illustrates, personal conviction can serve as a powerful force against institutional and social resistance.
"Lead performances and strong screenplay"
"Mixed but largely positive critical reception"
"Cut, slow motion, and camera angle techniques"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.