This paper examines why bureaucracy is widely regarded as a "necessary evil" within government. Drawing on Peters (2001) and Jackson (2002), it analyzes five key features that make bureaucracy both advantageous and essential: agency ideology, internal control mechanisms, inter-agency competition, incumbency of positions, and freedom of information. While bureaucracy is often criticized for producing red tape and inefficiency, the paper argues that its formalized, hierarchical structure promotes accountability, checks and balances, and effective service delivery to civil society. The analysis ultimately presents bureaucracy as an autonomous organizational body whose structured operation, though imperfect, is indispensable to the functioning of modern government.
The creation of an efficient and competitive civil service — the bureaucracy found in most governments today — is often identified as a "necessary evil." Bureaucracy is described as a specific form of organization that aims "to provide as much efficiency as possible" and to set up a "hierarchically structured decision-making process that reduces personal factors to a minimum" (Jackson, 2002:276).
It is evident that bureaucracy is created carrying with it advantages for the efficient performance of government. However, the claim that bureaucracy is a "necessary evil" is best expressed from the point of view of politicians and elected members of government. It may also reflect the opinion of people who have had frustrating experiences working with, or seeking help from, members of the bureaucratic government. Often termed "red tape," bureaucracy — instead of promoting efficiency and organization — may also mean the implementation of unnecessary, overcomplicated, or even obstructive official procedures. These are just a few examples illustrating bureaucracy as a detriment to the smooth processing of government transactions and activities.
This paper offers an analysis of the reasons why bureaucracy is considered a necessary evil and an important organization in government, often regarded as an agent for implementing checks and balances within it. The arguments that follow address the advantages of bureaucracy and the essential role it plays in improving government service for civil society.
In his book The Politics of Bureaucracy, Peters (2001) enumerates five issues that help explain why bureaucracy is necessary in government. The first issue he addresses is the seemingly lack of "agency ideology," which he defines as "well-developed ideas of what government should do." Political parties have agency ideologies, which may lead to the conclusion that they are far more efficient than the bureaucracy. However, Peters points out that bureaucracy has its own ideology — that is, bureaucracy is "interested in imposing a new set of policy priorities... civil servants become experts in their policy areas and develop ideas about how policy might be done better" (222).
This statement makes clear that bureaucracy facilitates the active participation of civil society, wherein citizens, as members of the bureaucratic government, perform their duty in service of society. Rather than being a passive administrative apparatus, bureaucracy develops institutional knowledge and policy expertise that political actors alone cannot provide.
Another issue that illustrates bureaucracy's efficiency and advantage is the presence of "not unworkable means" — that is, workable means to perform a particular task or process without the participation of politicians or elected officials who may have particular self-interests not beneficial to society. Jackson identifies this characteristic of bureaucracy as the presence of internal control (2002:280). This is where the issue of checks and balances within government takes place: with internal control in place, members of the bureaucracy are able to monitor the activities of and access to funds and political privileges by public servants.
This does not mean, however, that bureaucratic members should be antagonistic towards politicians. Internal control requires bureaucratic members to maintain objectivity while dealing with public servants, with utmost respect and due consideration given to them. The function of internal control is therefore one of oversight and accountability, not adversarial obstruction.
"Competition among agencies improves government performance"
"Position tenure incentivizes optimal bureaucratic performance"
"Information freedom supports independent agency operation"
From these discussions of the important features of bureaucracy in government, it is evident that it is almost synonymous with a business organization under the employ of the government. The presence of competition, an organizational structure similar to that of business entities, and the incumbency of its members together make bureaucracy a "necessary evil" for both civil society and the government.
You’re 51% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.