This paper examines altruism as a foundational theory in nonprofit organizations, tracing its definition from Webster and philosophical scholars to contemporary applications. The author explores altruism through multiple disciplinary lenses—sociological, psychological, economic, and anthropological—while emphasizing the sociological perspective of learned behavior. The paper contextualizes altruism within nonprofit practice, analyzing its role in volunteerism, charitable donations, and corporate philanthropy. Key debates between altruistic and egoistic motivations are discussed, alongside the distinction between behavioral and motivational altruism. The paper concludes that regardless of disciplinary interpretation, altruism remains essential to understanding nonprofit sector sustainability and the human impulse to contribute to the greater good.
Altruism, defined by Webster as "unselfish regard for or devotion to the welfare of others" (Webster, 1986), is a concept that extends far beyond simple generosity. According to J. Philippe Rushton, altruism "is defined as social behavior carried out to achieve positive outcomes for another rather than for self" (1980, p. 8; Ott & Dicke, 2012). For the purposes of this paper, altruism is understood as the price we pay to live on God's earth—a moral obligation to do for others.
The choice to examine altruism as a theory stems from a deep, rooted human connection to help one's fellowman and make meaningful contributions to society. This impulse appears across cultures and lines of diversity. The motivation to make good contributions to mankind absent of physical incentive—repeated and renewed without external reward—borders on the miraculous. Whether expressed through religious organizations, families, communities, societies, nations, or environmental stewardship, altruism fundamentally involves making life better for someone other than oneself and working collectively to achieve that goal.
The intent of this paper is to examine the theory of altruism and some of its key concepts. Central to academic debate is whether humans possess genuine "altruistic motive" (Ott & Dicke, 2012)—whether this motivation is genetic in nature, economic, selfless, or cognitive. These represent distinct interpretations of altruism and the motives behind sacrificial contributions to the greater good. The cognitive perspective is psychological, suggesting that an act performed for another is motivated purely by that intent and no other desire. In contrast, learned behavior derives from sociological theory, proposing that culture and environment shape how individuals are raised, what values they internalize, and what contributions they make to strengthen their communities. The academic discipline from which this theory originates is multifaceted, spanning psychology, sociology, economics, biology, and anthropology.
Altruism is a profound and multifaceted phenomenon studied across disciplines by scholars who each bring their own interpretations. Since the term was coined by a French sociological philosopher, the sociological perspective of learned behavior is emphasized here, supported by both historical record and theoretical tradition.
Auguste Comte, the French founder of positivism, coined the term "altruism" in the mid-1800s. Comte believed that people should be morally committed to serving the interests of others and contributing to the welfare of mankind. His philosophy operated from a specific metaphor: a baby born into this world enters with opportunities paved by those who came before. As the child grows, so does their obligation to do for others. This represents a natural debt of gratitude, repaid through service and kindness to humanity.
Historical examples illustrate Comte's vision. Martin Luther King Jr. exemplified this principle by standing against social injustice for all people. Mahatma Gandhi, Madam C.J. Walker, and numerous other leaders throughout history were driven by religious and moral convictions to improve the lives of others. Each pursued altruism not as a means to personal gain but as an expression of deeply held principle.
Key points in altruism theory center on "the debate over the relative importance of altruism and egoism" (Ott & Dicke, 2012). More specifically, this involves a rationalization of "an economic conception against the sociological one" (Ott & Dicke, 2012). Research demonstrates that the economic concept focuses on the behaviors of for-profit businesses, their corporate citizenship through donations to nonprofits, and volunteerism. In contrast, when individuals perform good deeds for alternative motives, this behavior is often classified as egoism rather than authentic altruism rooted in moral conviction. Given these variations, the debate can shift in multiple directions depending on how altruism is defined and measured.
The distinction between altruism and egoism is not always clear. An individual donating to charity might be motivated by genuine compassion, a desire for tax benefits, or both. Corporations might support nonprofits as part of authentic corporate citizenship or primarily for brand enhancement. Understanding these motivational complexities is essential to any coherent theory of altruism in practice.
Altruism manifests in different forms: "Behavioral Altruism, Motivational Altruism, Environmental Altruism and Economic Altruism" (Ott & Dicke, 2012). According to Daniel Bar-Tal (1985/86), "Behavioral approaches examine what an organism does, irrespective of the state of mind of the organism that does it," whereas motivational altruism "targets the intent to be altruistic; an act must be directed specifically towards an altruistic end." This raises a critical question: Is altruism caused by larger social structures such as religion, family, culture, and community, or is it an inherent trait?
Regardless of origin, altruism plays an important role in the nonprofit sector today. Understanding these variations helps explain why individuals and organizations contribute to causes in fundamentally different ways.
The theory of altruism is crucial to modern philanthropy and nonprofit work within society. Without altruism, identifying the philanthropic portion of the nonprofit sector and understanding the role of giving back would be difficult. The significance of altruism to nonprofit studies cannot be overstated.
Many nonprofits rely on alternative revenue streams involving the private sector. Due to the tax-exempt status of nonprofits and the nature of charitable giving, tax benefits to individual donors, corporations, and foundations have enormous economic impact on the sector. Altruism through volunteerism is equally important, as many nonprofits depend on volunteers to achieve their missions. While volunteers may lack financial resources, they donate their time and talent. Corporations practice good citizenship by making substantial donations and loaning out employees for volunteer work. A closer examination of altruism through comparative theory might reveal more about its impact on nonprofit sustainability.
"Comparing learned versus intrinsic altruistic motivation"
"Author's synthesis and embrace of altruism as theory"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.