This paper examines the government reinvention strategy as a framework for reforming public service delivery by shifting oversight and increasing administrator accountability. Using Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) as a case study, it applies Page's five dimensions of government accountability — legal oversight, improved supervision, professional norms, political voice, and market exit. The paper also draws on the Blacksburg Manifesto to address concerns about bureaucratic size and the relationship between capitalism and government. It argues that while privatization and contracting can improve efficiency, an overemphasis on market-based solutions risks fraud, favoritism, and a lack of transparency. Maintaining balance between bureaucratic oversight and private-sector delivery is presented as essential to effective, accountable governance.
The reinvention strategy involves reducing the total amount of governmental oversight while changing the focus of government. This occurs by increasing accountability and discretion among administrators, rather than eliminating the hierarchical structure itself. Such changes have a tremendous impact on the way government services are delivered to the public.
A good example of the reinvention strategy in practice can be seen with Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF), which specifically addresses the five different areas that Page identifies for understanding government accountability: legal oversight, improved supervision, professional training and norms, political voice, and market exit.
Legal oversight refers to greater flexibility in the program and the identification of specific objectives. Improved supervision means that more authority is given to individuals dealing directly with the public, rather than to various bureaucrats. Professional training and norms involves caseworkers helping clients to support themselves, instead of simply ensuring that clients qualify for a particular program. Political voice refers to the removal of entitlements, guaranteed benefits, and certain rights. Market exit is demonstrated when clients indicate that the new program is more effective in comparison with the previous one. These different changes refocus the way government services are delivered to the general public (Page 166–197).
Taken together, these elements illustrate how the reinvention strategy is changing the way various services are delivered. Rather than simply directing more money at a problem, this policy prudently utilizes government funds where they will have the greatest impact. The effectiveness of the programs increases because each person is held accountable for their own actions. In many ways, this approach is fundamentally changing how administrators interact with the general public.
"Examines bureaucratic size and privatization tensions"
"Argues for balanced public and market-based governance"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.