This paper examines procrastination as a behavioral and psychological phenomenon, defining it as a coping mechanism for avoiding negative emotions associated with tasks and decisions. Drawing on Fiore (2006) and Chu and Choi (2005), the paper explores the spectrum of procrastination from occasional to chronic avoidance and considers how social norms shape the causes and consequences of the behavior differently for various groups. The paper compares the experience of students and professors, then employees and employers, analyzing how responsibility, accountability, and leverage affect how procrastination manifests and how seriously it is judged in each role.
Procrastination is a behavior that involves avoiding a certain task or action β typically one of high importance β while being distracted by or focused on things of lesser importance. Fiore (2006) suggests that procrastination functions as a coping mechanism for dealing with the negative feelings that come with starting or finishing a task, completing an action, or making a decision. Just as procrastination arises from a need to avoid certain negative emotions such as anxiety or fear, it almost always causes negative consequences like stress, guilt, loss, failure, reduced productivity, or social and professional disapproval (Chu & Choi).
Like any human behavior, procrastination involves a variety of causes and consequences depending on the position of the person avoiding and the nature of the tasks or decisions being avoided. Moreover, like all human behavior, procrastination is judged according to certain standards of evaluation that are determined by social norms (Chu & Choi). In the case of procrastination, the expectations established by social norms are higher for those whose roles involve greater levels of experience and responsibility; thus, the causes and consequences of the same behavior can differ significantly for people in different social groups.
Procrastination exists along a spectrum β from occasional avoidance of tasks or decisions in light of special opportunities, to the consistent avoidance that becomes overwhelming and deeply affects one's productivity and outlook. Procrastination on occasion is entirely normal. In fact, it may be an intentional decision at times when something particularly unique or important arises, or when extenuating circumstances are present. The consequences of occasional procrastination may be mild or hardly noticeable.
Chronic procrastination, however, is drastically different. It suggests the probability of potentially serious psychological or physiological problems that need to be managed or treated, as well as the probability of severe consequences in both personal and professional life.
"How role expectations shape procrastination's impact"
"Power dynamics and procrastination in the workplace"
Procrastination is a complex behavior shaped by individual psychology, social role, and situational context. Whether one is a student, professor, employee, or employer, the underlying causes may be similar β avoidance of negative emotions, competing priorities, or deeper psychological issues β but the consequences and social judgments differ significantly depending on the level of responsibility and accountability involved. Occasional procrastination is a normal part of human experience, while chronic procrastination warrants serious attention and, in many cases, professional support.
You’re 32% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.