This paper examines the role of parking facilities in urban transportation systems, arguing that parking supply and management have wide-ranging effects on driver behavior, land use, economic development, and environmental outcomes. It surveys the advantages and drawbacks of increasing parking supply, compares types of parking (on-street, garage, and surface lots), and discusses market-based and regulatory approaches to parking management. The paper also considers equity implications of parking pricing and the political dynamics that shape planning decisions, concluding that ongoing expansion of parking infrastructure is necessary so long as the automobile remains the dominant mode of transportation.
Every trip taken by car requires parking at its destination, making parking facilities a critically important component of the roadway system. Parking is one of the first things people must deal with when traveling to a destination. When parking is convenient and affordable, people feel welcome. Parking that is hard to find, inadequate, inconvenient, or expensive will frustrate users and can contribute to problems in other areas. An inadequate parking supply creates problems for both users and non-users alike (4.3 Management of Parking Lots, n.d.).
Parking management includes a variety of approaches to encourage more efficient use of existing parking facilities, improve the quality of service provided to users, and improve parking facility design. It can help address a wide range of transportation problems while also helping to achieve transportation, land use development, economic, and environmental objectives (4.3 Management of Parking Lots, n.d.).
Free parking encourages driving and contributes to dispersed, automobile-dependent land use patterns. Many parking management strategies, by contrast, can significantly reduce automobile travel by shifting trips to other modes. Effective management also improves access by fostering more clustered, mixed land use patterns. The benefits of such strategies include efficiency and cost savings, reduced automobile use, improved urban design, positive business impacts, and reduced environmental impacts (4.3 Management of Parking Lots, n.d.).
On the other hand, increased management can raise transaction costs and produce spillover effects. Parking charges and restrictions in one area may drive motorists to park in other areas, where they create congestion problems. These unintended consequences must be carefully considered when designing any parking management program (4.3 Management of Parking Lots, n.d.).
Some parking management strategies provide significant benefits to lower-income and transportation-disadvantaged people. Most strategies benefit such populations by helping to create less automobile-dependent land use patterns, which expand travel choices. The pricing of parking can be regressive in isolation, but the overall equity impact depends on how revenues are used and on the quality of available travel alternatives. If revenues are directed toward benefits for lower-income households and good alternatives to driving exist, parking pricing and taxes can be progressive overall (4.3 Management of Parking Lots, n.d.).
"Political and financial benefits of expanding parking"
"On-street, garage, and surface lot comparisons"
"Market-based alternatives to parking regulation"
There are clear advantages and benefits to increasing the parking supply for drivers who need it and for businesses that depend on its availability. City planners and politicians, however, do not always agree on the best way to serve everyone's interests through expanded parking supply. Issues of cost and available space are persistent concerns. Most observers agree that as long as the automobile remains most people's preferred mode of transportation, planning for increased parking infrastructure will remain a regular and necessary task for every city.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.