This paper examines the concept of nature across four major traditions in political philosophy. Beginning with Plato's Theory of Forms and his organic vision of nature as grounded in the Form of the Good, the paper moves to Catholic Christian thinkers such as Augustine and Aquinas, who understood nature through humanity's partial fall from God. It then considers Protestant thinkers Luther and Calvin, for whom nature expressed divine plan and demanded individual faith. Finally, it surveys modern scientific philosophers including Locke and Burke, who grounded political thought in sensation, natural rights, and the concept of property. Each tradition reveals a distinct relationship between nature, morality, and political authority.
The concept of nature occupies a central place in political philosophy, yet its meaning shifts considerably depending on the thinker and tradition under consideration. Man is understood as a creation of God, entitled to happiness but bound by the laws of nature. Each major thinker approaches nature from a distinct angle, and these differences carry profound consequences for how they understand morality, society, and political authority.
Greek philosophers like Plato perceived nature in terms of Forms, or Ideas. These thinkers considered the Supreme Form to be the Form of the Good, which they related to the Sun as the source of illumination and understanding. Their conception of nature rested on two pillars: the Theory of Knowledge and the Theory of Being.
Plato considered the world to be a living creature possessed of a soul and a capacity for reason. He held an organic view of nature in which the heavenly bodies exhibited perfect symmetry. His analysis of nature in the political arena focused primarily on justice. He envisioned an ideal state composed of three classes — the economic, the security, and the political — each performing its proper function without interfering with the others.
His assumption about the basic nature of man was that a moral person is a truly happy person. This follows from the principle that to know good is to do good. Knowledge of the ultimate Form of the Good therefore guides moral decision-making, and it is precisely this knowledge that Plato believed political life requires of its participants.
Catholic Christian thinkers such as Augustine and Aquinas understood nature through the lens of the Supreme Being. In their view, humanity had fallen by revolting against God — yet this fall was only partial. Man's will had fallen, but his intellect had not. As a result, human beings retained the capacity to think, reason, and question the world, beginning with their own existence.
Because people could still act on the basis of their own wisdom, this tradition placed considerable weight on the individual's rational faculties. The Renaissance humanist currents that emerged in later centuries drew heavily on this Christian acknowledgment that reason, even in fallen man, remained intact and authoritative.
"Nature as divine plan requiring individual faith"
"Sensation, natural rights, and political freedom"
Each of these traditions reveals that the meaning of nature is never neutral — it always carries moral, theological, or political weight depending on the framework within which it is understood. From Plato's Form of the Good, through the Catholic emphasis on a partially fallen but still rational humanity, through the Protestant conviction that nature itself manifests divine will, to the modern empiricist grounding of rights in lived experience, the concept of nature has continuously shaped how thinkers define justice, authority, and the proper aims of political life.
You’re 62% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.