This paper examines the key motivations for warfare in Bronze Age Europe, roughly spanning the late third millennium to approximately 600 BCE. Drawing on scholarship by Johnson, Earle, Harding, Sherratt, and Kohl, the paper traces how the transition from Neolithic foraging societies to complex agrarian economies created conditions ripe for conflict. It discusses the role of metallurgical advances in the Aegean, the rise of commodity production, the development of trade networks, and the breakdown of reciprocal exchange systems. The paper argues that competition over limited natural resources — including arable land, water, and metals — along with expanding economic interdependence, were the primary drivers of Bronze Age warfare.
Historically, the Bronze Age in Europe began sometime in the latter years of the third millennium BCE and continued through the whole of the second millennium BCE and into approximately 600 BCE. As A. W. Johnson and T. Earle point out, it was during the European Bronze Age that human societies began to evolve from foraging groups — hunters and gatherers — to a complex agrarian system based on agriculture, involving the planting and harvesting of crops for foodstuffs and local trade (2000, p. 145). This transition also created towns and communities with large populations made up of merchants, farmers, artisans, and traders, a situation which soon required a new set of rules and regulations in the form of laws and codes of conduct.
Within this crowded landscape, new cultures arose and trading quickly became a necessity for survival, both economically and politically. In addition, there came about the "constant potential for aggressive competition over the most desired resources" — a kind of economic war in which individuals competed against each other for a share of the meager resources and materials needed for daily existence (Johnson & Earle, 2000, p. 10).
The Bronze Age was fully underway in ancient Greece and other parts of the southern European continent by the third millennium BCE, when advanced metallurgy in bronze, lead, silver, and gold developed on the island of Crete and in the Cyclades Islands of the Aegean Sea. These advances in metalworking apparently took place independently of similar developments in the Balkans and the Near East (Kohl, 2003, p. 29), an assumption which raises the possibility that the Greeks may have been the first Bronze Age culture to take full advantage of the potential held by metallurgy and its related skills. By devising new ways to alloy metals at high temperatures, Aegean smiths created a whole range of non-essential items and more highly designed tools for farming, the construction of dwellings, and for warfare in the shape of metal weapons far more lethal and enduring than their Neolithic counterparts, which were made exclusively of stone.
Thus, when metallurgical techniques evolved in sophistication and agricultural techniques began to produce valuable new products like olive oil and wine, along with specialization in the production of food and goods, the chances of warfare between societies and cultures also increased, due mostly to competition for the basic necessities of life during the Bronze Age.
One very important aspect of the transition from foraging groups, such as those found in the Neolithic Period, to a complex agrarian society has much to do with the rise of manufacturing in the form of pre-industrialization in Bronze Age Europe. As A. Harding describes it, manufacturing and production was at first "carried out in the domestic sphere" and on a relatively small scale, but when metallurgical techniques became more advanced — especially related to copper — "the items being produced (turned) from craft items into commodities" (2002, p. 297): those items which possessed more meaning and value, such as cooking utensils, jewelry, farming implements, and weapons.
According to A. Sherratt, the most important item related to farming was the development of the plough, "the first application of animal power to the mechanisation of agriculture" (2004, p. 159). This is where the conception of economics entered the Bronze Age picture, via the movement and exchange of goods and commodities through a vast trading system which extended into almost every part of Europe during the second millennium BCE.
As to the encouragement of warfare, when Bronze Age societies became increasingly interdependent, both economically and socially, the concept of reciprocity — a type of bartering system — became commonplace among the population of self-sufficient farmers, commodity producers, and artisans. Basically, this type of system had little to do with financial gain and was more inclined toward creating a sense of social value in order to strengthen social bonds. However, in many parts of Europe, the levels of economic interdependence quickly went far beyond reciprocity, evolving into very complicated systems of trade and exchange, thus creating circumstances in which warfare between rival groups and societies was bound to occur.
"Pasture disputes and limited resource exploitation"
"Chieftain authority and codes of communal conduct"
The conditions and motivations which encouraged warfare in the Bronze Age were very similar to those that currently exist in many troubled parts of the world, being the overwhelming need for limited natural resources and the desire to expand economically through the trading of necessary commodities.
You’re 68% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.