This paper examines employee performance appraisals from a human resource management perspective, focusing on what evaluations should accomplish versus what they often become in practice. Drawing on observed management behaviors, the paper argues that honest, balanced appraisals are essential for employee motivation and growth, yet are frequently undermined by personal feelings, office politics, and supervisory self-interest. The paper highlights specific misuses—such as using appraisals to push out unwanted employees—and calls for a return to candid, constructive evaluation that employees can approach without fear or distress.
From a human resource management perspective, the primary objectives of an employee performance evaluation should be to honestly assess the employee's contributions, motivate them by acknowledging areas where they excel, and clearly identify areas in need of improvement. A well-conducted appraisal offers a candid review of both work output and work habits. However, as workplace experience consistently reveals, that ideal is far from universally achieved. Too often, office politics, personal feelings, and the pressures of day-to-day operations creep into the appraisal process, creating problems rather than solutions.
In practice, performance appraisals are frequently misused in ways that undermine their intended purpose. Some managers use evaluations as a mechanism to ease an unwanted employee out of the department — moving them through the organizational ranks simply to avoid direct confrontation rather than addressing performance issues head-on. In other cases, an appraisal functions as an indirect signal that the employee should begin looking for work elsewhere, rather than providing a genuine assessment of their future with the company.
While some evaluations may appear fair and balanced on the surface, many are inflated or deflated to minimize friction for the supervisor rather than to give an honest accounting of an employee's work and value to the organization. Although performance reviews are designed to help determine eligibility for raises and promotions, they are routinely misapplied and misunderstood. The result is a process that serves administrative convenience rather than genuine employee development.
Contributing factors include fear of legal liability, personal relationships between supervisors and subordinates, and a broader culture of conflict avoidance in many organizations. When supervisors prioritize self-protection over candor, the appraisal loses its credibility and its usefulness as a developmental tool.
"Standards for fair, constructive performance review"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.