This paper presents a critical analysis of Gary Nash's Race and Revolution (1990), a short history exploring why the Founding Fathers failed to abolish slavery during and after the American Revolution. The review examines Nash's central thesis, his organizational approach, use of primary source documents, and his debunking of widely held historical myths. Key themes include the economic and cultural forces behind slavery's perpetuation, the decline of northern abolitionism in the early nineteenth century, and the fragility of the new American union on the question of slavery. The paper concludes with a personal assessment of the book's contribution to understanding American history.
This paper presents an analysis of Race and Revolution by Gary Nash. The author's thesis for this short history of enslavement and rebellion during the American Revolution concerns what caused the Founding Fathers to fail to abolish slavery when they had the opportunity. Nash writes, "In particular, I wish to stress the role of the northern states in the failure to abolish slavery and to show how economic and cultural factors intertwined in what was not a judicious decision by the leaders of the new American nation but their most tragic failure" (Nash, 1990, p. 6). In addition, the book examines how revolutionaries at first embraced abolition, their failure to create a slave-free nation, and the ways black Americans coped in the white world after the Revolution.
Nash's purpose in writing this book was to offer a different perspective on the American Revolution and to explain why the Founding Fathers failed to outlaw slavery in the new nation. This is one of the most enduring questions in American history: why did it take one hundred years and a war to end slavery, when the Founding Fathers could have ended the practice once and for all when they framed the Constitution?
Nash shows that this was a difficult decision not only for modern observers but for the Founding Fathers themselves. He writes, "Such poignant comments [against slavery], often coming from the South as well as the North, tell us that in the eyes of many leaders the continuing presence of slavery left the union of states highly fragile from the day the Constitution took effect" (Nash, 1990, p. 27). Nevertheless, abolitionism failed, and the country would ultimately have to fight a Civil War to settle the issue. This book helps the history student understand the forces that led to that failure, and how it shaped the country in the decades that followed.
Nash organizes the information quite effectively through chapters that discuss the periods before, during, and after the American Revolution, tracing the changing views of slavery across time. He uses a timeline-based approach to structure the book, which makes it easy to place in context with other texts on the Revolution. He follows the birth of the new nation through shifting views on society and culture, and identifies a trend in the early nineteenth century that ultimately doomed the abolitionist movement. He writes, "Any ember of northern desire to participate in a national plan for abolition, gradual or immediate, had ceased to glow. Instead, a belligerent white supremacism was manifesting itself throughout the North" (Nash, 1990, p. 49). Nash found that this trend continued throughout the first half of the century in many areas, which helps explain why enslaved people did not gain their freedom before the Civil War.
The book is composed of a series of essays, and Nash provides substantial documentary evidence to support the claims made in each. He presents these primary sources at the end of the book, allowing the reader to examine his conclusions and verify them against the authentic historical documents he used. For example, he draws on a number of documents in the first chapter as testimonials to specify just how many people opposed slavery both before and during the Revolution, and to demonstrate that the framers of the Constitution did have a choice — they simply did not take it.
These documents make clear that the Founders could have eliminated slavery, and that the moment was, in many respects, an excellent opportunity to do so. Nash uses his research and documents effectively, and he presents his conclusions frankly, leaving the reader no uncertainty about where he stands on his thesis. He relies on numerous direct quotations from source documents and does not merely imply his conclusions — he states them outright. He also writes in a style that is academic without being overly pedantic, making the book accessible and easy to follow.
"Essays backed by historical documents and quotes"
"Nash challenges myths about Southern opposition to abolition"
"Multiple forces perpetuating slavery after the Revolution"
"Book's value for understanding American history"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.