This paper examines two key concepts in managerial accounting: flexible budget variance and volume variance. It begins by distinguishing static budgets from flexible budgets, explaining how the latter adjusts revenue and expense levels to reflect actual activity. The paper then defines flexible budget variance as the difference between actual results and the flexible budget model, noting that this variance is typically smaller than that produced by a static budget. Volume variance is defined as the difference between actual and budgeted quantities multiplied by a standard price or cost, and the paper discusses its calculation, its relationship to the bill of materials, and the conditions under which it is likely or unlikely to arise.
A budget is an estimation made by a business at the beginning of a financial period. The budget prepared at the outset will not reflect the exact amount of resources the business will incur over the entire financial period — it may be less or more than what is actually spent. Because the business does not yet know the full resources needed for the year, it is required to prepare a static budget, which contains estimates of anticipated resource expenditures covering a specific period of either one year or six months.
When the year ends, the business prepares another budget that shows the exact amount of resources used for the entire fiscal year. This end-of-year budget is the flexible budget. Comparing the static budget with the flexible budget will reveal a variance, as one will generally be less or more than the other by year-end. This essay focuses on the difference between flexible budget variance and volume variance.
From the provided case study on medical practice budgeting, a conventional approach has been adopted that does not operate on prior-year budget figures as other businesses might. The flexible budget shows differing levels of revenues and expenses based on the amount of sales activity that occurred during a specified period. Actual revenues or actual units sold during a given period are recorded in the flexible budget model, while the levels of budgeted expenses are generated automatically within the model.
Flexible budget variance is any difference recorded between actual results and the flexible budget model (Balakrishnan, Sivaramakrishnan, & Sprinkle, 2008). When actual revenues are entered into the flexible budget model, the variance that arises reflects differences between actual expenses and budgeted expenses only, without affecting the revenue side. Total flexible budget variance should be smaller when compared with the total variance that would be posted if the static budget model were used from the beginning. This is because the revenue level or unit volume in the flexible budget model is adjusted to match actual results. When an organization records a high budget variance, it signals that the formulas used in the budget model need to be adjusted so that the model can more accurately reflect actual results.
"Defines volume variance formula and when it arises"
Any volume variance calculation involves the difference between unit volumes multiplied by the standard cost or price. The costs of products used in calculating volume variance are retrieved from the recorded bill of materials, which itemizes the cost required to construct one unit of a product along with standard unit quantities. These costs are posted under the assumption of standard production run quantities.
Volume variance most commonly arises when an organization sets theoretical standards, wherein a certain theoretical optimal number of units is expected to be used in the production process. When an organization sets attainable standards instead, volume variance is unlikely to arise, because the expected quantities to be used already incorporate a reasonable allowance for inefficiency (Davis & Davis, 2011).
Both flexible budget variance and volume variance are important tools in managerial accounting. Flexible budget variance measures the gap between actual results and what the flexible budget model predicted, and is generally narrower than static budget variance because revenue levels are adjusted to actual activity. Volume variance, by contrast, isolates the effect of differences in units consumed or sold relative to what was budgeted, and is multiplied by a standard price or cost to quantify its financial impact. Together, these two measures help organizations evaluate the accuracy of their budgeting models and identify areas for improvement in planning and operations.
Balakrishnan, R., Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Sprinkle, G. (2008). Managerial Accounting. John Wiley & Sons.
Davis, C. E., & Davis, E. (2011). Managerial Accounting. John Wiley & Sons.
You’re 85% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.