This paper examines the chemical senses — smell and taste — with a focus on the cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying chemosensory processing. It reviews how olfactory and gustatory systems interact to produce flavor perception, drawing on cross-modal integration, attentional binding, and learned associations such as taste-odor synesthesia. The paper also discusses the specialization of receptor cells, early central processing events, and the role of active sampling behaviors such as sniffing and licking. Throughout, it highlights how higher-order cognitive factors including expectation, attention, and value modulate even the earliest stages of chemosensory processing, and identifies key directions for future research into chemosensory disorders and perception.
Smell and taste are important components of the sensory system, playing a critical role in food and nutrition selection, the hedonic experience of eating, and the support of healthy metabolism for quality of life. The olfactory and gustatory systems display considerable variety in their mechanisms of transduction, and over the past decade there has been substantial progress in understanding the core mechanisms of smell and taste. Understanding the functions of normal chemosensory organs has helped clarify the molecular actions underlying disorders of smell and taste. More than two million Americans are affected by chemosensory disorders, and this number continues to grow alongside the broader population.
Disorders of smell are more common than taste disorders, due in part to anatomical differences in the olfactory system and the fact that a decline in olfactory function is a recognized part of normal aging. Common complaints involving olfactory and gustatory function arise from medications, respiratory infections, sinus and paranasal disease, and damage to the peripheral nerves that supply smell and taste. Most chemosensory complaints have identifiable causes. Although the diagnosis of smell and taste disorders has improved considerably over the past twenty years, treatment options remain limited to reversible and discernible causes. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms of chemosensory function, establish reliable diagnostic procedures, and raise public awareness (Spielman, 1998).
The study of flavor has been approached in a manner parallel to the ecological view of perception. Gibson (1966) argued that the primary purpose of perception is to identify objects in the environment, particularly those that are biologically significant. From this perspective, the psychological origin of sensory data is less important than its utility in object identification; successful perception is that in which sensory data is decoded as the qualities of an object. Accordingly, flavor can be understood as a functionally distinct sense, constructed from the psychologically integrated inputs of separate sensory systems — specifically gustation and olfaction (Prescott, 2012).
Cross-modal integration of the sensory systems is most often inferred from multimodality responses — typically an enhanced response to information received from one sensory system when another is also engaged (Calvert et al., 1999). For example, speech comprehension in a noisy environment improves when the listener can also observe the speaker's lip movements. Similarly, information from one modality can increase the neural response to stimuli in another, augmenting both behavior and performance. There is also evidence that when odors and tastes are combined into a single flavor, they interact in ways that alter the perception of each (Prescott, 2012).
The most widely recognized expression of this interaction is the attribution of taste-like qualities to odors. When asked to describe the smell of vanilla or caramel, people commonly report that it "smells sweet." Similarly, vinegar is described as smelling sour (Stevenson & Boakes, 2004). In a detailed analysis of odor descriptions, 65% of participants selected "sweetness" as an appropriate characteristic of vanilla, while 33% used "sour" to describe hexanoic acid. These attributions resemble synesthesia, in which stimulation of one sensory modality produces a consistent and automatic response in another (Stevenson et al., 1998; Martino & Marks, 2001). Unlike rare forms of synesthesia in other modalities, the attribution of taste qualities to smells appears to be largely universal (Prescott, 2012).
"Cognitive attention modulates taste-odor enhancement"
"Chemosensory receptor cells and chemical selectivity"
"Brain gating and sniffing behaviors in chemosensation"
The studies discussed here reveal the diversity of approaches to studying chemosensory processes. Across these varied perspectives, several recurring themes emerge that unite these studies into a coherent picture. One such theme is the critical role of receptor cells: although chemosensory receptor cells are broadly tuned in many cases, some show a high degree of chemical specificity. This specificity represents a mechanism for extracting detailed information about the chemical features of tastes and smells. Receptor cells also serve as an important site of signal gating, controlling input to the brain and playing a central role in chemical perception (Katz et al., 2008). In this sense, many of the fundamental features of chemical processing are established early in the system.
You’re 37% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.