This paper examines Erdely's investigative article on campus rape at a major university and the subsequent Washington Post critique. The author argues that despite factual disputes raised by the Post, the broader realities of institutional negligence, pervasive misogynistic culture, and widespread campus sexual violence remain substantiated. The paper evaluates how media coverage shapes public understanding of sexual assault on college campuses and considers the practical and psychological complexities victims face in seeking justice and documentation.
Erdely's article explores the phenomenon of campus rape through the case study of a young woman named Jackie, who was allegedly gang raped in 2012. Although the focus of the article is definitively on Jackie and her particular situation—its ramifications and effects on her personal life—this account is viewed within the wider context of a disturbing pattern of assault, violence, and sexual misconduct directed against women at a major research university. This educational institution is under federal investigation for violations of women's rights related to numerous allegations of rape, sexual misconduct, and violence. Erdely's article explores multiple allegations alongside the overarching culture surrounding the university and this insidious pattern.
One of the more revealing aspects of the article is the implication that the university system—and perhaps even the surrounding country—is not only largely tacit about many of these affairs but actively complicit with them. Erdely describes firsthand how the university utilized bureaucratic tactics and procedural obstruction to impede her investigation of the aforementioned allegations. The author implies that those involved in what appears as a conspiracy include the university's president, select and prominent counselors, and various board members. The author suggests that the university has consistently attempted to downplay these allegations to avoid negative stigma about such misconduct, which could harm its reputation and financial interests.
Perhaps the most ominous aspect of this article is the way it demonstrates that sexual misconduct, misogyny, and mistreatment of female students are ingrained in the school's culture. The existence of numerous instances of rape reported on college campuses across the country is undisputed in this story and corroborated by the Washington Post's follow-up reporting and Rolling Stone's subsequent retraction. The fact that there is a federal investigation into this matter is also not in question. Thus, whatever details regarding Jackie's account that are disputed do not change these fundamental facts—nor the compelling evidence found in the lyrics to one of the university's longstanding songs, which are filled with lewd misogyny and derogatory comments about women.
The piece issued by the Washington Post largely appears as a cover-up or an attempt to discredit the young woman who was the focus of Erdely's story. In doing so, the Post chooses to focus on details that are, for the most part, inconsequential and do little to negate the culture of misogyny perpetuated by the educational institution or the nationwide (if not global) trend of violating and harming female college students. For instance, one alleged friend of the woman now questions her entire story because Jackie supposedly changed her account from five attackers to seven. Additionally, a source who refused to speak to Rolling Stone yet granted an interview to the Post claims that he did not see signs of physical damage to her and could not recall which fraternity house she said the attack supposedly occurred in.
Even if the woman is mistaken about the name of one of her attackers and the specific fraternity to which he belonged, these details are severely mitigated by the fact that someone perpetuated a very traumatic assault on this woman's life, regardless of his name, fraternity, or the nature of the event during which the alleged attack occurred. The Post appears to be attempting to obscure or induce doubt about this fundamental fact, and in doing so seems to be 'fortuitously' working in concert with one of the most prestigious and longstanding fraternal organizations in American university history—which is desperately trying to eschew blame for this assault while not acknowledging the destructive culture of which it is an integral part. The terms cover-up and damage control, while somewhat colloquial, accurately describe the Washington Post piece in relation to the interests of the fraternity alleged to have conducted the assault.
"Practical consequences for survivors and barriers to justice"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.