This paper examines Bernard Lonergan's philosophical framework for understanding human experience and knowledge. Drawing on Lonergan's theory that knowing unfolds through multiple stages — external experience, internal emotional reaction, insight, and judgment — the paper explores how memory and reflection shape our perceptions of reality. Using accessible examples such as revisiting a childhood place or losing a baseball game, the paper illustrates how internal experience often proves more formative than external events. It also considers Lonergan's caution against hasty or data-poor judgments, while acknowledging the legitimate role of instinctive reaction in sound decision-making.
Nearly everyone has had the experience of revisiting an old childhood place, movie, or favorite childhood food, only to find that the memory of the experience was not nearly as pleasurable as they recalled it to be. This sensation is testimony to the power of memory and reflection in shaping our inner emotional landscape, and to how often our emotions can interfere with our perceptions of reality.
The philosopher Bernard Lonergan suggested that there are different types of knowing. The first step, external experience, takes place in the interaction between the individual's consciousness and the environment outside of the self. However, the internal, emotional experience of reacting to the real world — and the memories spawned by that experience — may be more potent than the actual experience itself. The reason for the potency of certain memories has to do with what Lonergan describes as a multi-stage process of making sense of one's internal self in relation to the external world. Often, the external experience is less important than what is learned about oneself through it.
"Childhood example illustrates internal over external experience"
"Balancing deliberate judgment with instinctive gut reaction"
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.