This paper presents a comprehensive valuation of AirThread Connection (ATC) in the context of a proposed acquisition by American Cable Communication (ACC), one of the largest U.S. cable operators. The analysis examines the strategic rationale for the acquisition, including ACC's lack of a wireless offering and ATC's competitive cost disadvantages. Using Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) and Adjusted Present Value (APV) methods, the paper projects AirThread's financials from 2008 to 2012, estimates operational synergies such as backhaul cost reductions and bundling revenue gains, and arrives at a final enterprise valuation. The results demonstrate a significant increase in ATC's value post-acquisition, supporting the strategic case for the deal.
The fundamental objective of this report is to present a valuation of AirThread Connection. Discounted cash flow analysis and the Adjusted Present Value (APV) method are employed to arrive at a comprehensive enterprise valuation.
"American Cable Communication (ACC) was one of the largest cable operators in the United States" (Stafford & Heilprin, 2011, p. 36). In December 2007, ACC cable systems reached approximately 48.5 million homes, with approximately 24.1 million video subscribers. The company also had 4.6 million landline telephone subscribers and 13.2 million high-speed internet subscribers. ACC's consolidated revenue in 2007 was $30.9 billion and net income was $2.6 billion. At that time, ACC offered internet, video, and landline telephony; however, the company did not provide a wireless offering, allowing competitors to exploit this gap in its product lineup. Facing looming competitive threats arising from its lack of wireless service, ACC decided to acquire AirThread Connection (ATC), believing it could achieve a competitive advantage through the acquisition.
"AirThread Connection (ATC) was one of the largest regional wireless companies in the United States, providing service in more than 200 markets in five geographical regions" (Stafford & Heilprin, 2011, p. 37). ATC's revenue was approximately $3.9 billion and its operating income reached $400 million in 2007. However, AirThread faced cost disadvantages due to stiff competition, primarily from incumbent local exchange carriers (ILECs). Moreover, AirThread was experiencing slower growth and higher customer retention costs.
Since American Cable Communication was not offering wireless services and AirThread provided wireless service, the acquisition of AirThread could assist both companies in growing and expanding their market base. Together, both companies would enjoy cost advantages and broader market reach. Expanding into additional lines of business would assist American Cable Communication in increasing cost efficiency and network utilization. The following potential advantages could be derived from the acquisition (Luenberger, 1998):
With the valuation of AirThread Connection, this report segregates the potential synergies into various categories.
The potential synergies in the valuation of AirThread are as follows:
First, there would be a reduction in AirThread's backhaul costs, estimated at 20% of AirThread's operating expenses. AirThread's backhaul costs would still require the use of microwave transmission and leased lines in many areas. Additionally, there would be gradual cost savings amounting to 6% of operating costs, realized over four years starting from 2009.
A more complex set of synergies to evaluate involves the increase in revenue resulting from bundling and cross-selling with American Cable Communication's services. This would enable both companies to attract business customers by offering a combined package of wireless service, internet service, and wireline telephony. Further details on synergy estimation are drawn from the concept of merger synergies, which encompasses both cost and revenue components.
Exhibit 1 is used for the AirThread projections, enabling an understanding of AirThread's total revenue, EBIT, EBITDA, and unlevered net income. This information supports the computation of discounted cash flows from the 2008 fiscal year through the 2012 fiscal year. Depreciation & Amortization, Capital Expenditures, and the assumptions established in AirThread Connections Exhibit 1 are also incorporated.
Revenue Projections
Service Revenue: 2008: $4,194.34 | 2009: $4,781.51 | 2010: $5,379.23 | 2011: $5,917.22 | 2012: $6,331.43
Sales of Equipment: 2008: $314.78 | 2009: $358.83 | 2010: $403.71 | 2011: $444.09 | 2012: $475.18
Total Revenue: 2008: $4,509.12 | 2009: $5,140.34 | 2010: $5,782.94
System Operating Expenses: 2008: $838.88 | 2009: $956.32 | 2010: $1,075.86 | 2011: $1,183.42 | 2012: $1,266.26
Costs of Equipment Sold: 2008: $755.47 | 2009: $861.21 | 2010: $968.86 | 2011: $1,065.77 | 2012: $1,140.37
General, Selling & Administrative: 2008: $1,803.63 | 2009: $2,056.16 | 2010: $2,313.18 | 2011: $2,544.47 | 2012: $2,722.62
EBITDA: 2008: $1,111.13 | 2009: $1,266.71 | 2010: $1,425.03 | 2011: $1,567.53 | 2012: $1,677.28
Depreciation & Amortization (included in EBIT calculation below)
EBIT: 2008: $405.90 | 2009: $462.73 | 2010: $557.61 | 2011: $645.17 | 2012: $724.37
Tax Rate Applied: 2008: $162.35 | 2009: $185.11 | 2010: $223.03 | 2011: $258.08 | 2012: $289.73
Net Operating Profit After Tax (NOPAT): 2008: $243.56 | 2009: $334.57 | 2010: $387.11 | 2011: $434.63
Before considering the total value of AirThread, it is essential to estimate the synergies. Exhibit 5 is used to estimate AirThread's synergies, including the differences in total assets, liabilities, and owner's equity between 2005, 2006, and 2007. These calculations support the AirThread valuation using both APV and DCF methodologies.
Assets ($ millions)
Cash & Cash Equivalents: 2005: 29.0 | Diff: +3.9 | 2006: 32.9 | Diff: +171.6 | 2007: 204.5
Marketable Securities: 2005: 0.0 | Diff: +249.0 | 2006: 249.0 | Diff: −232.6 | 2007: 16.4
Accounts Receivable: 2005: 362.4 | Diff: +45.0 | 2006: 407.4 | Diff: +28.1 | 2007: 435.5
Inventory: 2005: 92.7 | Diff: +24.5 | 2006: 117.2 | Diff: −16.2 | 2007: 101.0
Prepaid Expenses: 2005: 32.1 | Diff: +2.9 | 2006: 35.0 | Diff: +6.6 | 2007: 41.6
Deferred Taxes: 2005: 8.2 | Diff: −8.2 | 2006: 0.0 | Diff: +18.6 | 2007: 18.6
Other Current Assets: 2005: 15.5 | Diff: −2.1 | 2006: 13.4 | Diff: +2.8 | 2007: 16.2
Total Current Assets: 2005: 539.9 | Diff: +315.0 | 2006: 854.9 | Diff: −21.1 | 2007: 833.8
PP&E: 2005: 2,553.0 | Diff: +75.8 | 2006: 2,628.8 | Diff: −33.7 | 2007: 2,595.1
Licenses: 2005: 1,362.3 | Diff: +132.0 | 2006: 1,494.3 | Diff: −11.9 | 2007: 1,482.4
Customer Lists: 2005: 47.6 | Diff: −21.4 | 2006: 26.2 | Diff: −10.8 | 2007: 15.4
Marketable Equity Securities: 2005: 225.4 | Diff: −220.5 | 2006: 4.9 | Diff: −4.9 | 2007: 0.0
Investments in Affiliated Entities: 2005: 172.1 | Diff: −21.8 | 2006: 150.3 | Diff: +7.4 | 2007: 157.7
Long-Term Note Receivable: 2005: 4.7 | Diff: −0.2 | 2006: 4.5 | Diff: −0.1 | 2007: 4.4
Goodwill: 2005: 481.2 | Diff: +4.3 | 2006: 485.5 | Diff: +5.8 | 2007: 491.3
Other Long-Term Assets: 2005: 30.0 | Diff: +1.1 | 2006: 31.1 | Diff: +0.7 | 2007: 31.8
Total Assets: 2005: 5,416.2 | Diff: +264.3 | 2006: 5,680.5 | Diff: −68.6 | 2007: 5,611.9
Liabilities & Owner's Equity ($ millions)
Accounts Payable: 2005: 254.1 | Diff: +0.8 | 2006: 254.9 | Diff: +5.9 | 2007: 260.8
Deferred Revenue & Deposits: 2005: 111.4 | Diff: +11.9 | 2006: 123.3 | Diff: +20.1 | 2007: 143.4
Accrued Liabilities: 2005: 42.9 | Diff: +4.9 | 2006: 47.8 | Diff: +11.4 | 2007: 59.2
Taxes Payable: 2005: 36.7 | Diff: −9.8 | 2006: 26.9 | Diff: +16.2 | 2007: 43.1
Deferred Taxes (current): 2005: 0.0 | Diff: +26.3 | 2006: 26.3 | Diff: −26.3 | 2007: 0.0
Note Payable: 2005: 135.0 | Diff: −100.0 | 2006: 35.0 | Diff: −35.0 | 2007: 0.0
Forward Contract: 2005: 0.0 | Diff: +159.9 | 2006: 159.9 | Diff: −159.9 | 2007: 0.0
Derivative Liability: 2005: 0.0 | Diff: +88.8 | 2006: 88.8 | Diff: −88.8 | 2007: 0.0
Other Current Liabilities: 2005: 82.6 | Diff: +11.1 | 2006: 93.7 | Diff: +4.0 | 2007: 97.7
Total Current Liabilities: 2005: 662.7 | Diff: +193.9 | 2006: 856.6 | Diff: −252.4 | 2007: 604.2
Long-Term Debt: 2005: 1,001.4 | Diff: +0.4 | 2006: 1,001.8 | Diff: +0.5 | 2007: 1,002.3
Forward Contracts (long-term): 2005: 159.9 | Diff: −159.9 | 2006: 0.0 | 2007: 0.0
Derivative Liability (long-term): 2005: 25.8 | Diff: −25.8 | 2006: 0.0 | 2007: 0.0
"Free cash flow and NPV with and without synergies"
"APV method with tax shield and enterprise value"
The final valuation places AirThread Connection's enterprise value at approximately $7,455,806,667 using both APV and DCF methodologies. The acquisition is projected to increase ATC's value by $4,340.97 million under the APV approach and by $6,115.36 million under the DCF approach, after accounting for synergies. The DCF valuation yields a base NPV of $7,733.61 million rising to $13,848.97 million on the upside when synergies are fully realized. These results confirm that the strategic and financial rationale for ACC's acquisition of AirThread Connection is well-supported by quantitative analysis, with meaningful value creation expected through backhaul cost reductions, bundling revenue, and expanded market penetration. For broader context on merger and acquisition value creation, the academic and practitioner literature consistently emphasizes the importance of rigorously quantifying synergies prior to deal completion.
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.