There is no question that terrorists seem to have an interest in such weapons. However, while they may make a concerted effort to get these weapons, they may still lack the technology and financial abundance to deploy such weapons on a massive scale. It is not impossible, and it is certainly prudent to be on guard for any plots involving weapons of mass destruction.
The best possible argument one can make based on evidenced gathered by intelligence agencies is that many terrorist groups do have interest in weapons of mass destruction. Many attempt to acquire the raw materials for these weapons. However, there is not proof yet, solid proofs, that terrorist have the ability to use these weapons or deploy them on a massive scale that would result in havoc throughout the world. Nonetheless, government agents have a duty to be on high alert to keep abreast of terrorists activities. They should in doing so however, keep the media at bay. The more the media promotes such language, the more validity and credence they give to terrorists entities that thrive on publicity to fulfill their purpose... instilling terror and fear in the hearts of the public at large.
Conclusions
There is much media coverage surrounding terrorists. Much of the media suggests the government supports the belief terrorist plan to use weapons of mass destruction against all people. These weapons include chemical agents, nuclear agents and other powerful tools that can when deployed properly, result in widespread damage. Despite the publicity given to the treat of terrorism, and terrorist use of such weapons, proof of this threat remains elusive.
Much media coverage acknowledges the lack of solid, hard-core evidence that terrorists are organized to a point where they (1) have the resources to create weapons of mass destruction and (2) have the ability to deploy such weapons on a massive, potentially global scale. These are questions one must consider when evaluating the treat weapons of mass destruction pose to the public at large.
Whether terrorists have the resources to use weapons of mass destruction...
WMD Annotated Annotated Webography: Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) With the attacks on September 11th, 2001, the United States came face-to-face with the reality that our security strategy is far from impenetrable. To the contrary, the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, and more recently, the Boston Marathon bombing, proved that we are quite vulnerable to mass casualty events. Perhaps most worrisome is the concern that such an
Weapons of Mass Destruction Nuclear Weapons in the 21st Century Security Environment The apparent anti-proliferation approach of the George W. Bush Administration to nuclear and other Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) seems to coincide with the perspective of Scott Sagan in The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate, as opposed to the deterrence perspective of his co-author, Kenneth Waltz. Security for major nations is currently under greater threat by the destabilizing effects
Weapons of Mass Destruction and the Next Terror: Assessment of How a Significant Terrorist WMD Attack Might Be Conducted by a Non-State Actors Perpetrator and Why They Can't Stage an Attack Weapons of Mass Destructions (WMD) have considerable effect to the economies of both developed and developing countries. In the modern world, most terror groups have resolved to use Weapons of Mass Destruction to harm their enemies. The entire syndicate comprises
Countering the Threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMDs) Purpose Statement Chemical, biological, radiological, and nuclear (CBRN) weapons of mass destruction (WMD) area a threat that can completely disrupt an entire nation’s way of life. The current situation in China is a perfect illustration of what can happen when a biological weapon is used to destabilize a nation’s economy. China is currently grinding to a halt as the Covin-19 virus spreads like
Weapons of Mass DestructionIntroductionThis paper addresses the methodology, and discusses the findings of the research. It also offers conclusions and recommendations for addressing the problem of WMD prevention. It applies the theoretical perspectives of Taylor and Follett and also looks at the impact of having an ethical framework in place. It concludes with recommendations for establishing an international effort to bring about the collaboration needed to prevent WMD proliferation.MethodologyThe method
(Rebehn M.) Another example from the 1700's of the use of bacterial agent in war was in the conflict between Russia and Sweden in 1710. There are reports that the Russians used the bodies of plague victim to create an epidemic among the enemy. (HISTORY of BIOLOGICAL WARFARE) There is also the infamous incident in American history of the intentional infection of the native Indians with smallpox. "An English general,
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now