Paper Example Masters 1,324 words

Views of Immanuel Kant and Eduard Hanslick on Formalist and Modernist Approach Art and Music

Last reviewed: November 8, 2011 ~7 min read
Abstract

Analysis of Kant's views on aesthetics from "The Critique of Judgment" and how they can be applied to music. Also, Hanslick's arguments regarding music and aesthetics. Moreover how these philosophies can be applied to 19th century music and composers from Mozart to Wagner.

Kant, Hanslick and Music

Kant and Hanslick on Music and the Beauty Thereof

Several theories have been formulated regarding how art should be evaluated aesthetically and how this aesthetic evaluation can be applied to music. While some contend that aesthetics and music should be evaluated from a Marxist perspective in which socio-historic factors are taken into consideration, others contend that a work of art should be judged based upon its form or structure. In order to better understand what can and is considered beautiful, one can look to Immanuel Kant's The Critique of Judgment; likewise, Eduard Hanslick in Vom Musikalisch-Schonen: Ein Betrag Zur Revision der Asthetik der Tonkunst (On the Musically Beautiful: A Contribution Towards the Revision of the Aesthetics of Music) is able to build upon Kant's arguments regarding beauty and attempt to define what makes music aesthetically pleasing.

Music is a special kind of art because it is considered to be a uniquely human process. Due to music's uniqueness, it is believed that certain values can be expressed through the medium and that music has the potential to be a vehicle for the expression of values. Furthermore, music is a subdivision of sound with the other category being comprised of noise. While noise does not have a formal structure of any sort, "music is the sole source of organized sound" (Graham, 95). Moreover, music has the capacity of being used to convey ideas that "relate to audible changes in strength, motion, and proportion…consequently [including]…ideas of increasing and diminishing, acceleration and deceleration, clever interweavings simple progressions [of ideas] and the like" (Robinson, 296).

Music is also unlike all other forms of art since it requires an audience to be willing to partake or participate in the art. Since no one forces an individual to listen to music then it is the listener that makes the determination as to what he or she will listen to. Eduard Hanslick contends that,

The servile dependence of the various special aesthetics upon a supreme metaphysical principle of general aesthetics is steadily yielding ground to the conviction that each particular art demands to be understood only of itself, through knowledge of its unique technical characteristics. (Hanslick, 2)

Hanslick argues that differing forms of art must be criticized based upon standards and characteristics that are specific to that art form. Furthermore, Hanslick argues that the intent of art is to "externalize an idea actively emerging in the artist's imagination" (31). In the case of musical expression, the artist is trying to convey a tonal idea that they have conceived and must express through a musical composition. However, in order to fully enjoy music as an art form, the listener must determine if they enjoy what they are hearing or if dissonance is being created, either cognitive or aural, and if what they are listening to can be considered to be musically acceptable.

According to Hanslick, the definition of what is musically beautiful does not consider what should be, but rather takes into account what is. Musical beauty relies upon musical form, or the way in which melodies and harmonies are structured within a musical piece. Despite the fact that music can be arranged or structured in a specific way, the structure does not imply that the artist has any emotional feelings that they have attached to the composition (Robinson, 295).

Immanuel Kant contends that beauty is variable and subjective stating that "the judgment of taste…is not a cognitive judgment, and so not logical, but is aesthetic -- which means that it is one whose determining ground cannot be other than subjective" (Kant, 51). Kant continues to argue that scientific markers cannot be used to calculate beauty, "for a science of the beautiful would have to determine scientifically…whether a thing was to be considered beautiful or not" and would therefore eliminate subjectivity (58).

Kant also believed that aesthetics transcended personal preferences and also relied on a specific set of rules that determined how art and aesthetics were judged. Kant's believed that aesthetic judgment could be separated from 1) factual judgments because of aesthetics' subjectivism, 2) subjective judgments due to the fact that aesthetic judgments rely on social agreement, 3) practical rationality because of the belief that serves no practical principle, and also from 4) judgments that are considered to be fanciful and superficial because Kant contends that aesthetic judgment must appear to serve a purpose (Graham, 18).

Once it is determined what makes a specific work of art or piece of music beautiful, then it must determined what kind of pleasure is derived from experiencing the work of art. When the pleasure that is derived from music is identified, attention is shifted from the composer, who determined the structure of the piece, to the listener who is then tasked with identifying what pleasure is derived based upon personal (and possibly social) standards and to what extent the pleasure is derived (Graham, 78).

During the 19th century, music structures began to change and a new set of standards by which music was aesthetically judged had to be formed. Classic 19th century music built upon the style and the formal procedures that had been established during the 18th century and was usually structured in sonata form, whereas the emerging "avant-garde" music of the era utilized an individualistic approach to musical expression ("Classicism and the Avant-Garde in 19th-Century Music"). The sonata was based upon "principles of repetition, contrast, and return of musical materials" and solely took into account musical considerations ("Classicism and the Avant-Garde in 19th-Century Music"). Such musical considerations included exposition, development, modulation, and recapitulation. The major composers of this classical school of composition included Mozart, Haydn, Beethoven, and Brahms. On the other hand, avant-garde music, or music that did not follow the structure that had been established in the 18th century and applied to the classical compositions, was used to express ideas and to tell stories through music. It was through experimentation with traditional musical structure that the program symphony and the symphonic poem arose. Also, unlike classical music, avant-garde music was often accompanied by a written explanation of what the musical elements represented ("Classicism and the Avant-Garde in 19th-Century Music"). Major composers that utilized this avant-garde approach to music included Berlioz, Liszt, and Wagner.

You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2011). Views of Immanuel Kant and Eduard Hanslick on Formalist and Modernist Approach Art and Music. PaperDue. https://paperdue.com/essay/views-of-immanuel-kant-and-eduard-hanslick-116238

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.