Verified Document

Veterans Of War And What They Are Promised From Politicians Essay

Politics and Veterans Veterans of war have always been a selling point for politicians in election years. Throughout history one can see how whether on the campaign trail or sitting in office already, politicians have skillfully used veterans in order to promote a "fair deal" or "benefits" to the troops coming home. They do this as a way to curry favor with the public, to show that they can for the soldiers, to show that it pays to go to work for Uncle Sam, and that when an individual does right by his country, his country does right by him. Thus, there was Truman's "Fair Deal," FDR's "New Deal," Harrison's pensions for the Civil War veterans, Nixon and Vietnam Veterans Day, and today's VA hospitals and VA loans, designed to assist veterans in their transition from military to civilian life. Politicians have used the plight of the veterans yesterday and today (whether it is Donald Trump or Bernie Sanders makes no difference -- there is always the cry of protest that we need to take better care of our soldiers). This paper will examine ways in which policies toward veterans benefits have been used by politicians at particular points in American political history.

The Gilded Age that followed the Civil War saw a veritably Republican dominated White House -- beginning with Lincoln and ending with the election of FDR. Republicans at this time were skillful in their use of the Civil War: they blamed it on the Democrats and so Union veterans flocked to the Republican Party. President Benjamin Harrison, who had served in the Civil War under Sherman, promoted the idea of pensions for Civil War veterans and "signed a bill providing additional support...

Harrison's efforts were linked to his philanthropy and humanitarianism -- for he also supported a number of measures designed to assist in educating the South and helping African-Americans. However, his support of veterans was an example of how the Republican Party attempted to appeal to the soldiers who had fought to hold the Union together. The fact that the Party cast blame for the war on the Democrats was disingenuous, for one could easily argue that had Lincoln (a Republican) not been elected, there may have been no war at all but rather a more decided attempt at a peaceful, lawful resolution (as Jefferson Davis had hoped) (Foote, 1958). Nonetheless, Republican leaders in the Gilded Age attempted to appease the Union that had virtually been ripped apart with half a million men dead as a result of the war: they did this by "sticking up" for the veterans and by painting themselves as the do-gooders who had nothing to do with that awful war. For this reason, they were called the "bloody shirts," because they were always waving around the "bloody shirt" of the soldier and accusing their political opponent (the Democrat) of being the root cause of the blood. It was not true in the least -- as the Republican Party was full of violent abolitionists. All the same, the veteran was used as a political ploy to curry favor with a sentimental public.
Of course, war never really ended for America and before the 19th century came to a close, American soldiers were fighting Spain for control of the Philippines in an effort to expand American hegemony around the world. World Wars I and II followed, as did the glowing patronage of Uncle Sam for the veterans whom He pledged to love so much that he did not mind entangling them in one foreign war after another. Woodrow Wilson, one of only two Democrats to enter the White House (between Lincoln and FDR), ran on the platform of keeping America out of the war (World War I) -- but he failed to keep that promise when the British began having trouble. Wilson's election…

Sources used in this document:
References

The Age of Political Machines. (2013). Politics in the Gilded Age. Retrieved from http://sageamericanhistory.net/gildedage/topics/gildedagepolitics.html

Bennett, M. (1999). When Dreams Came True: The GI Bill and the Making of Modern

America. NE: Potomac Books.

Foote, Shelby. The Civil War: Ft. Sumter to Perryville. NY: Random House, 1958.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Military Leaders World War 1 As Well As After the War
Words: 2606 Length: 7 Document Type: Essay

American Military Leaders The fighting of the First World War (WWI) started during 1914 and ended on 1918. The Second World War (WWII) started a lot later in 1939 and ended in 1945. These are the biggest military conflicts in the history of humankind. In both wars, military alliances formed by groups of countries were involved. The First World War (World War I, the War to End All Wars, the Great

Rules of Engagement for War
Words: 314 Length: 1 Document Type: Term Paper

Rules of Engagement for War In summary, there are a number of highly eminent reasons why ROE is creating an adverse effect on American military personnel -- particularly in overseas missions in Afghanistan. They are presenting a fundamental conflict of interest -- soldiers have to consider both their mission objectives as well as the legal ramifications of not adhering to ROE, which creates situations of hesitancy, delay, and American casualties as

Canada's Involvement in the Vietnam
Words: 3989 Length: 14 Document Type: Term Paper

According to the papers, Pearson indicated concern about the nature of the bombing and questioned Johnson about the potential use of nuclear weapons. While Pearson appeared willing to acknowledge that conventional bombing raids would be used against the North, he was clear that the deployment of nuclear weapons would be considered entirely unacceptable by both the Canadian government and people. History has been critical for Pearson's handling of the situation.

Roe in Afghanistan
Words: 580 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

WARFARE RULES OF ENGAGEMENT (EDIT CUSTOMER'S DRAFT) One of the most contentious issues in contemporary warfare is the concept of rules of engagement (ROE). Just as the Vietnam War highlighted the concept in the 1960s, America's current involvement in Afghanistan provides the contextual background in the early 21st Century. In principle, ROI ensure that combat troops comply with the international conventions of warfare, even if our enemies are not. The

Herbert Hoover
Words: 4508 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

Herbert Hoover When Herbert Hoover became president in 1929, the foundations of economic stability were already beginning to crumble. The demand for mass produced items had peaked, and new areas of spending that would recover the downturn were leveling off. Investors were not hurrying to build new areas of growth since market creation was troublesome. Hoover, or the Great Engineer as he called himself, had many plans for large studies of

Budgetary Politics
Words: 5817 Length: 18 Document Type: Term Paper

Budgetary Politics The United States of America has long grappled with the problem of drugs and has form time to time initiated measures to combat the usage and trafficking of drugs. It is common knowledge that the various wars that have been part of the combat program of several administrations have failed miserably despite the availability of a great deal of resources, added to the colossal funding process. This is in

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now