Business Statistics
Regression
Variables Entered/Removeda
Model
Variables Entered
Variables Removed
Income ($1,000), Cups of Coffee per Day, Age, Days per Month at Starbucksb
Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
All requested variables entered.
Model Summaryb
Model
R
R Square
Error of the Estimate
Durbin-Watson
Predictors: (Constant), Income ($1,000), Cups of Coffee per Day, Age, Days per Month at Starbucks
Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
ANOVAa
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
Regression
Residual
Total
Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
Predictors: (Constant), Income ($1,000), Cups of Coffee per Day, Age, Days per Month at Starbucks
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t
Sig.
Collinearity Statistics
B
Std. Error
Beta
Tolerance
VIF
1
(Constant)
10.949
10.562
1.037
.312
Age
.415
.270
.313
1.535
.140
.873
1.146
Days per Month at Starbucks
1.005
.692
.362
1.452
.162
.584
1.712
Cups of Coffee per Day
-2.590
1.235
-.520
-2.096
.049
.590
1.696
Income ($1,000)
.166
.169
.201
.984
.337
.873
1.146
a. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Model
Dimension
Eigenvalue
Condition Index
Variance Proportions
(Constant)
Age
Days per Month at Starbucks
Cups of Coffee per Day
Income ($1,000)
1
1
4.683
1.000
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
2
.152
5.546
.02
.03
.03
.43
.13
3
.084
7.451
.03
.23
.16
.03
.39
4
.056
9.109
.08
.00
.51
.40
.47
5
.024
14.014
.87
.74
.28
.14
.00
a. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Predicted Value
17.48
42.97
29.96
5.823
25
Residual
-21.080
19.592
.000
9.494
25
Std. Predicted Value
-2.144
2.235
.000
1.000
25
Std. Residual
-2.027
1.884
.000
.913
25
a. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
Regression
Variables Entered/Removeda
Model
Variables Entered
Variables Removed
Method
1
Gender, Age, Income ($1,000), Cups of Coffee per Day, Days per Month at Starbucksb
Enter
a. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
b. All requested variables entered.
Model Summaryb
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R. Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
Durbin-Watson
1
.532a
.283
.095
10.598
1.655
a. Predictors: (Constant), Gender, Age, Income ($1,000), Cups of Coffee per Day, Days per Month at Starbucks
b. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
ANOVAa
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
5
1.501
.236b
Residual
19
Total
24
a. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
b. Predictors: (Constant), Gender, Age, Income ($1,000), Cups of Coffee per Day, Days per Month at Starbucks
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t
Sig.
Collinearity Statistics
B
Std. Error
Beta
Tolerance
VIF
1
(Constant)
12.669
11.280
1.123
.275
Age
.421
.276
.318
1.528
.143
.871
1.148
Days per Month at Starbucks
.888
.741
.320
1.198
.246
.529
1.891
Cups of Coffee per Day
-2.636
1.262
-.530
-2.089
.050
.587
1.704
Income ($1,000)
.185
.176
.223
1.050
.307
.836
1.197
Gender
-2.393
4.692
-.110
-.510
.616
.818
1.223
a. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Model
Dimension
Eigenvalue
Condition Index
Variance Proportions
(Constant)
Age
Days per Month at Starbucks
Cups of Coffee per Day
Income ($1,000)
Gender
1
1
5.158
1.000
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.01
2
.566
3.020
.00
.00
.01
.02
.00
.61
3
.118
6.602
.01
.01
.00
.54
.25
.21
4
.080
8.045
.05
.31
.12
.01
.29
.08
5
.055
9.664
.06
.02
.52
.31
.46
.03
6
.023
15.093
.88
.65
.35
.12
.00
.06
a. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Predicted Value
18.19
44.45
29.96
5.927
25
Residual
-20.423
20.625
.000
9.429
25
Std. Predicted Value
-1.986
2.444
.000
1.000
25
Std. Residual
-1.927
1.946
.000
.890
25
a. Dependent Variable: Amount of Prepaid Card $
1. Starbucks Debit Card
Multiple regression was used to explore how well the amount of the prepaid card can be predicted by other variables, and which variables show the most promise for generating a prediction. The results of the regression indicated that the four predictors explained only .27 of the variance (R2 = .27, F = 1.881, p >.05). The coefficients for the independent variables are as follows: Age, ? = .313; Days per month, ? =.362; Cups of Coffee per day, ? = -.520; Income ($1,000) ? = .201. Of these, the number of cups of coffee per day is significantly predicted the amount of money on the prepaid Starbucks cards purchased by the customers (? = -.520, p
2. Prediction of Days per Month at Starbucks
The results of the regression indicated that the four predictors (debit card amounts were not included) explained only .47 of the variance (R2 = .471, F = 4.457, p ?.01). This model is a better fit, but ideally we would look for R2 to be in the mid to high 90s. The coefficients for the independent variables are as follows: Age, ? = -.138; Gender, ? =-.248; Cups of Coffee per day, ? = -.516; Income ($1,000) ? = .268. Days per month Number of cups of coffee consumed per day predicted the days per month at Starbucks (? = .516, p
Regression
Model Summaryb
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R. Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
Durbin-Watson
1
.687a
.471
.366
3.197
1.384
a. Predictors: (Constant), Gender, Age, Income ($1,000), Cups of Coffee per Day
b. Dependent Variable: Days per Month at Starbucks
ANOVAa
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
4
45.545
4.457
.010b
Residual
20
10.219
Total
24
a. Dependent Variable: Days per Month at Starbucks
b. Predictors: (Constant), Gender, Age, Income ($1,000), Cups of Coffee per Day
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Predicted Value
5.73
17.15
10.76
2.755
25
Residual
-5.260
7.960
.000
2.918
25
Std. Predicted Value
-1.826
2.319
.000
1.000
25
Std. Residual
-1.645
2.490
.000
.913
25
a. Dependent Variable: Days per Month at Starbucks
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t
Sig.
Collinearity Statistics
B
Std. Error
Beta
Tolerance
VIF
1
(Constant)
6.804
3.043
2.236
.037
Age
-.066
.082
-.138
-.806
.430
.899
1.112
Cups of Coffee per Day
.926
.320
.516
2.897
.009
.833
1.201
Income ($1,000)
.080
.050
.268
1.599
.125
.942
1.061
Gender
-1.949
1.346
-.248
-1.448
.163
.903
1.107
a. Dependent Variable: Days per Month at Starbucks
Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Model
Dimension
Eigenvalue
Condition Index
Variance Proportions
(Constant)
Age
Cups of Coffee per Day
Income ($1,000)
Gender
1
1
4.264
1.000
.00
.00
.01
.01
.01
2
.515
2.876
.00
.00
.05
.00
.73
3
.118
6.006
.02
.01
.79
.28
.21
4
.074
7.592
.08
.25
.15
.65
.03
5
.029
12.175
.90
.74
.00
.07
.00
a. Dependent Variable: Days per Month at Starbucks
Charts
3. Predict Sales Revenue By Number Of Drinks Sold
Multiple regression was used to explore the impact a number of variables have on revenue generation. The results of the regression indicated that the four predictors explained 1.000 of the variance (R2 = 1.000, F = 3084.3, p >.001). The coefficients for the independent variables are as follows: Average Weekly Earnings, ? = 1.392; Sales Year, ? =.118; Number of Stores, ? = -.006; Number of Drinks ? = -.516. The Durbin-Watson statistic is 3.243, which indicates there is a multicollinearity problem. The relation between the tolerance and the VIF is VIF=1/Tolerance. The variance inflation factor (VIF) for all variables is quite high which indicates a problem with multicollinearity. However, the tolerance levels, which reflect how much of the variance can be accounted for with each individual variable are all less than 0.3, so they can be discounted as inconsequential to the model outcomes. The model needs to be corrected for autocorrelation. In addition, other models should be generated to test the impact of eliminating some of the variables. For example, the beta of Average Weekly Earnings is higher than the betas for the other variables, and two of the variables (# of Stores; # of Drinks) have negative signs, which signals a strong predictive relationship with revenue generation. Growth in the number of stores remains one of the most interesting of the variables as Starbucks has at times been plagued by its own cannibalization of stores and rapid expansion as a competitive strategy. The diversification into increasingly more types of drinks is also a good variable to watch, however, product diversification is a key strategy for moving into different markets. Year-over-year same store revenue is missing from this analysis, yet it is relevant to consideration of stores expansion.
Regression
Model Summaryb
Model
R
R Square
Adjusted R. Square
Std. Error of the Estimate
Durbin-Watson
1
1.000a
1.000
1.000
17.534
3.243
a. Predictors: (Constant), Average Weekly Earnings, # of Stores, # of Drinks, Sales Year
b. Dependent Variable: Revenue
ANOVAa
Model
Sum of Squares
df
Mean Square
F
Sig.
1
Regression
3792956.548
4
948239.137
.000b
Residual
2
Total
3793571.429
6
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue
b. Predictors: (Constant), Average Weekly Earnings, # of Stores, # of Drinks, Sales Ye
Coefficientsa
Model
Unstandardized Coefficients
Standardized Coefficients
t
Sig.
Collinearity Statistics
B
Std. Error
Beta
Tolerance
VIF
1
(Constant)
-11620.134
-4.779
.041
Sales Year
43.409
51.238
.118
.847
.486
.004
# of Stores
-.003
.040
-.006
-.079
.944
.016
62.311
# of Drinks
-66.603
14.663
-.516
-4.542
.045
.006
Average Weekly Earnings
33.612
7.017
1.392
4.790
.041
.001
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue
Coefficient Correlationsa
Model
Average Weekly Earnings
# of Stores
# of Drinks
Sales Year
1
Correlations
Average Weekly Earnings
1.000
-.902
-.923
-.905
# of Stores
-.902
1.000
.885
.685
# of Drinks
-.923
.885
1.000
.692
Sales Year
-.905
.685
.692
1.000
Covariances
Average Weekly Earnings
49.237
-.254
-94.989
-325.236
# of Stores
-.254
.002
.519
1.406
# of Drinks
-94.989
.519
Sales Year
-325.236
1.406
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue
Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Model
Dimension
Eigenvalue
Condition Index
Variance Proportions
(Constant)
Sales Year
# of Stores
# of Drinks
Average Weekly Earnings
1
1
4.769
1.000
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
2
.216
4.698
.00
.00
.01
.00
.00
3
.014
18.618
.00
.02
.14
.01
.00
4
.002
54.307
.00
.16
.04
.15
.00
5
2.917E-6
1.00
.82
.81
.85
1.00
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue
Residuals Statisticsa
Minimum
Maximum
Mean
Std. Deviation
N
Predicted Value
7
Residual
-17.147
13.350
.000
10.123
7
Std. Predicted Value
-1.281
1.494
.000
1.000
7
Std. Residual
-.978
.761
.000
.577
7
a. Dependent Variable: Revenue
Charts
4. Contribution of Gender to Model
You’re 80% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.