As prediction, this warning is highly plausible, given the incipient balkanization of mixed Iraq neighborhoods and the great profusion of blood let therein. As ethics, the warning rests on the unstated premise that America has an obligation not to abandon Iraq to genocide (Steorts, Jason Lee, 2007, p. 43)."
From a U.S. perspective, to pull U.S. troops out of Iraq would silence the detractors, the anti-war sector, but it would be harmful to the U.S. In many other ways, especially on an international level. The U.S. would lose credibility with those countries that the U.S. has assured we would not leave Iraq in desperate straits. It would not serve the U.S. well on an international level as a credible world leader to withdraw American forces from Iraq and leave the country vulnerable and susceptible to every manner of radical force that is represented by those people in the country now who refuse to recognize a legally elected government.
There is an answer for each of the questions that Charles Freeman, Jr., put before the symposium in 1999; and those answers are obvious. There is much to be done in Iraq, and it is not a mission that can be accomplished in a short period of time. One the most significant findings of the current Iraq war is that the Iraqi soldier under Saddam Hussein served under coercion, fear for their own life or fear for the lives of their families (Wong, Leonard, Koldiltz, Thomas, Millen, Raymond, and Potter, Terrence, M., 2003, p. 7). American soldiers are volunteer military, and have a high sense of commitment to America, their military branch, their fellow soldiers, and to their mission. Right now, more so than the American leaders who are attempting to use the American soldier as pawns in their political games - a very serious political game considering the loss, and what is at stake; the American soldier is still the best representative of Americans on the front line. "Sergeant Dan Lockhart of the 3rd Armory Calvary Regiment was wounded in Iraq just one month after his baby daughter was born. His wounds were so...
The American administration was well aware of the genocidal massacre of the Tutsi by their Hutu neighbors that accounted for more than a million innocent victims killed, mostly by machetes that would have posed less of a problem to U.S. forces had they been deployed to stop the carnage in Rwanda. Similar atrocities, albeit less in number, have been ongoing in Sudan and especially in Darfur since before Operation Iraqi
[…] With the U.S. now mired in a Mesopotamian morass because of what is described as a 'unilateralist' foreign policy, the UN's multilateralist approach is gaining unearned prestige and unwarranted credibility" (Grigg, 2006). While the UN might not have masterminded the war, they certainly participated in the events that led up to the invasion, so they did play an important role in arguments for the invasion, and now they
U.S. INVADED IRAQ IN 2003 Why U.S. Invade Iraq 2003 invasion of Iraq has a number of forceful effects that relate to the influence of the 9/11 occurrence in the country. The then U.S. president who happened to have been President Bush pushed for the U.S. invasion of Iraq amidst the actions that Saddam had done to the U.S. In most avenues of performance, it is clear that the U.S. attack
It can be assumed that this rise in public opinion for U.S. intervention can be attributed to possible challenges or difficulties that Iraqis could experience once U.S. troops are fully withdrawn and security has been completely detached from U.S. military intervention. Moreover, Americans have become more conservative this year, as can be attributed also to the financial crisis that hit the country in the last quarters of 2008. This concern
U.S. Approach to Terrorism U.S Approach to Terrorism Post 2001 The incidence of September 11, 2001 led to an anti-terrorism campaign by the government of U.S. And was called the war or terror. Since 2001, U.S. government has taken several steps to maintain security and counter terrorism by implementing certain strategies at national and international level. These approaches and steps, whether useful or not have been discussed in this paper. President Bush's Justifications
The international community can obviously respond by seeking to marginalize the Taliban and similar movements as extremists. However, it has become clear following the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that western governments have not been effective in infiltrating terrorist networks and pre-empting attacks. It has also become clear that there will be no shortage of people in the Islamic world who are willing to
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now