Verified Document

Traditional Negligence And Res Ipsa Essay

Contrastingly, this law will not be applied to private practices because in those cases, only the direct health care worker is considered responsible. This brings us to the idea of shared responsibility of a certain situation. This doctrine can be applied to the administration because at the end of the day it is the administration that overlooks the hiring of the medical workers. Under the major principles of vicarious liability, one person can be held responsible because of a negligence caused by someone else. (Larson, 2005) Student 2

Vicarious liability most commonly occurs when the accused carries out an action with in employment. The person who does the mistake which could either be a nurse or a doctor does so to pursue the employer's interest. Because the employer and the employee shared the same duty and interest, eventually they also share the responsibility. Due to this reason, we see that the doctrine of respondeat superior and vicarious liability is applied to the administration. Therefore we see that whenever a doctor or a surgeon does some form of negligence, the hospital has to incur the penalties along with the person who caused the negligence. Furthermore, it is up to the administration to deal with the negligent afterwards. Many administrations go on to fire the person or to put them on some sort of probation. The control over the employee is an important aspect that the court looks over in such cases.

Question 3

The laws that were discussed earlier are made to ensure that good quality medical care is served to the citizens. The health care field is quite sensitive such that any mistake or negligence can serve the person...

In my opinion, both traditional negligence and Res Ipsa Loquitur keep a well deserved check on the medical care workers. The doctrine of respondeat superior is also a good checkpoint. This doctrine keeps the medical administration and the doctors and nurses in check. This entire concept of shared responsibility therefore makes the system more efficient and reduces the chances of error.
Governmental immunity is such that it prevents a patient from asserting a lawsuit against the government facility unless the facility allows to the lawsuit. This law suit basically prevents the federal and state government officers and employees protected from lawsuits unless they consent to the lawsuit.

References

Bal, B. And Brenner, L. (2010). Medical negligence and breach of duty claims can be separated by the courts | Orthopedics Today. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.healio.com/orthopedics/business-of-orthopedics/news/print/orthopedics-today/%7B161f8d10-bbdb-4a75-9830-2ad1d4486d75%7D/medical-negligence-and-breach-of-duty-claims-can-be-separated-by-thecourts [Accessed: 16 Jul 2013].

Larson, A. (2005). Negligence and Injury Lawsuits. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.attorneys-usa.com/negligence/negligent_injury.html [Accessed: 16 Jul 2013].

Prosser, W. (1949). Res Ipsa Loquitur in California. California Law Review, 37 (2), pp. 183-234.

Regan, J. And Regan, W. (2002). Medical Malpractice and Respondeat Superior. Southern Medical Journal, 95 (5).

Unknown. (2002). Governmental Immunity. [e-book] http://www.cozen.com/admin/files/publications/slavik1963083.pdf [Accessed: 16th July 2013].

Sources used in this document:
References

Bal, B. And Brenner, L. (2010). Medical negligence and breach of duty claims can be separated by the courts | Orthopedics Today. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.healio.com/orthopedics/business-of-orthopedics/news/print/orthopedics-today/%7B161f8d10-bbdb-4a75-9830-2ad1d4486d75%7D/medical-negligence-and-breach-of-duty-claims-can-be-separated-by-thecourts [Accessed: 16 Jul 2013].

Larson, A. (2005). Negligence and Injury Lawsuits. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.attorneys-usa.com/negligence/negligent_injury.html [Accessed: 16 Jul 2013].

Prosser, W. (1949). Res Ipsa Loquitur in California. California Law Review, 37 (2), pp. 183-234.

Regan, J. And Regan, W. (2002). Medical Malpractice and Respondeat Superior. Southern Medical Journal, 95 (5).
Unknown. (2002). Governmental Immunity. [e-book] http://www.cozen.com/admin/files/publications/slavik1963083.pdf [Accessed: 16th July 2013].
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Negligence Torts, Duty of Care and Available
Words: 886 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Negligence Torts, Duty of Care and Available Remedies People commit torts all the time, intentionally and unintentionally, and many of these are dismissed, excused, ignored or otherwise allowed to transpire without resorting to litigation for remedies. For instance, if someone's foot is stepped on a couple of times in a crowded elevator, it may be a tort but it also may not be a big deal. In some cases, though, the

Negligence of Auditors
Words: 1085 Length: 3 Document Type: Case Study

Negligence of Auditors Policy Considerations In the past one decade, there have been rampant cases against auditors, reflecting both on the litigious nature of a plaintiff's bar, which encourages claims against independent certified public accountants Owing to this, there have been numerous literatures encouraging the imposition of civil liability on accountants whose actions fail to conform to professional standards. Therefore, many courts after considering the scope of an auditor's vulnerability to negligence have

Negligence and Respondeat Superior: Should Employers Be
Words: 710 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Negligence and Respondeat Superior: Should Employers be Held Responsible for Employee Negligence? Negligence "A person has acted negligently if he or she has departed from the conduct expected of a reasonably prudent person acting under similar circumstances" (West, 2008). To establish a claim of negligence, a plaintiff has to establish four elements: duty of care, breach of duty, factual causation, and damages (Berry, Sahradnik, Kotzas, & Benson, 2013). The duty of care

Negligence Tort Law Is an
Words: 737 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

"Cause" is the next element needed for a successful negligence suit, but this is probably the most intricate element involved. The first aspect of "cause" is known as "cause in fact," and involves demonstrating that the defendant's actions, or lack of action, actually caused the harm suffered by the plaintiff. For example, the patient in the case actually suffered paralysis as a result of the surgery. It must be pointed

Negligence Generally, in Order to Sustain a
Words: 619 Length: 2 Document Type: Term Paper

Negligence Generally, In order to sustain a cause of action for negligence, a plaintiff must establish that the defendant owed him a duty of care, that the defendant breached that duty of care by his negligent commission of an action (or by his negligent omission of action), and that the defendant's breach of that duty of care was the proximate cause of tangible harm to the plaintiff (Dobbs, 2001). In addition, and

Negligence in Coaching Liability for
Words: 1291 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Sanders's injury was more as a result of the "hard falls" of softball, rather than any sort of "rough treatment" that occurred as a result of improper supervision. The "rough treatment" category of head-butting football players can easily be distinguished from the more passive interaction between sliding ankle and first base. When the facts of a case clearly demonstrate improper supervision of "rough treatment" athletic activity, the courts have had

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now