Rule of law is a concept that reflects a number of different facets. The World Justice Project outlines some of these facets. The first is that the government and individuals are both accountable under the law. In a society, the rule of law should reflect that all entities are subject to the law. If there are entities that are not subject to the rule of law, then the rule of law has no validity. Thus, all governmental and non-governmental actors are to be subject to the same set of laws, and to equal enforcement of those laws. The second facet of the rule of law concept is that the law is written and codified. The law should be written down so that its application cannot be arbitrary, and that all who live under this law can readily understand the law. If the law is not written, then it can be capricious. If the law is not available for the public to view, then there is no guarantee that the law will be applied equally and fairly because there is no opportunity for those outside of the legal system to examine different cases and ensure that the law is the same for everybody. One of the most important facets of the rule of law...
The administration of law is complex, and it is important that this application is fair and equal to all. There are many ways in which this concept manifests. For example, in modern Western societies, the practice of law is a specialized field for which market prices are fairly high. This, however, creates a situation where some people or entities have greater access to the legal system than others, because they have the requisite financial means. It undermines the rule of law to have situations where an entity essentially has no recourse under law when wronged because of the cost of accessing the legal system. In non-Western societies, the situation can be more stark, where people are disempowered to even seek legal remedy because they hold a status that forbids this.
Better still, don't let it happen. (para. 61) In the United States, citizens take a dim view of unbridled police powers. They were condemnatory of Samuel a. Alito, a young U.S. President Ronald Reagan administration lawyer, and Supreme Court nominee, who took an expansive view of government law-enforcement powers in manycases where he was called upon to balance the prerogatives of police and prosecutors with the rights of individuals, according
Consequent to the Holocaust, Israel developed a tradition in treating non-Jews differently from how it behaved toward Jewish people. It appears that Jews were influenced by the nationalist waves that dominated the European landscape during the second half of the twentieth century (Levy and Weiss 7). The Law of Return did not succeed in doing one of the main things it was expected to-that of increasing the Jewish population in
Many of these have been challenged throughout the years. In fact, here have been a number of cases challenging age discrimination within this more complicated situation. In the case, EEOC v. City of Janesville an individual fought the fifty-five-year cut off age for police officers in that county (Vance 1986). Opponents of the age cut off argued that age discrimination was acceptable only in "particular business," meaning for police officers
Rule, (3) Analysis, (4) Conclusion. The Issue phrased form a question. (Example: "Was client Negligent caused accident talking cell phone?") The Rule law applies case. Google's online book searching service -- does it infringe copyright? Google's decision to scan millions of books and to make it possible for individuals to search them online was largely believed to be irresponsible at the time when it was first discussed in 2004. This idea
Law of Contract Contract law As to concerned definition of law there are many definition among various schools of thought of law such that no particular definition is acceptable to them as universal definition of law, but nevertheless there is a common acceptable definition as to what the law is composed of and that it is a collection of rules and regulations governing human conduct prescribed by human beings for the obedience
Oliver Wendell Holmes states that justice is subjective and changes according to the viewer's prejudice, viewpoint or social affiliation. But a set of rules is needed to make society function and these rules must be carried out. This philosophy of law applies to Ann Hopkins' case. The senior partner and admissions committee had the prerogative of setting out the rules with which partners should be selected. Their sense of justice
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now