Terrorism
There have been various definitions and views of terrorism that have beenfronted over the years. It has been described as a strategy and at other levels as a tactic, some have called it a crime and yet other refer to it as a holy/noble duty; some consider it an inexcusable abomination yet others consider it a systematic reaction to oppression. Obviously, a lot depends on whose point-of-view is being represented, be it theological, political or psychological. Also terrorism can be seen as willful destruction (killing) of people or destruction of property by people not acting on behalf of an established government to redress a real or imaginary injustice attributed to an established government. However it is important to note that not all cases of willful destruction of people or property are acts of terrorism (Red Cross Organization, 2007).
Some of the important definitive characteristics of terrorism include among others; the act of destruction performed by a person or group of persons not acting on behalf of an established government, the act of destruction carried out to redress a real or imaginary injustice, and the act aimed directly or indirectly at an established government. Without these three characteristics an act of willful destruction of people or property cannot be termed as terrorism. This can be either an act of war, or matter of internal policy, or an ordinary common law crime. Therefore from these characteristics we can say that if the destruction of people (killing) or property is undertaken by or on behalf of an established government against another country, it is considered war, not terrorism.
The perspective that one has on the acts of terrorism depend a lot on the belief and the point-of-view that the person is representing. For instance there is the perspective that glorifies the acts of terrorism as long as they are directed towards the West and countries that support them. The terrorists view themselves as people with a noble duty of redeeming the world from the 'evils' of the west and the 'ungodly' influences from the West. At the same breath, the people who could be on the receiving end like the West and the allied countries will view terrorism as an act of cowardice and an evil thing that should not be allowed in the society and there is need to break all the terrorism networks in order to redeem the world.
The terrorism has now taken the route of suicide bombing. This can be attributed to the various factors as the heightening of security with many bombers being arrested after the bombing; many opt to die to avoid eminent arrest. The other fact is to do with the religious training and orientation that they stand to be rewarded for the lives they have taken immediately so they would prefer death so as to reap these fruits in "paradise" immediately. The last fact in this scope has to do with inability or unwillingness to take responsibility, they do not want to be responsible for their actions thereafter hence opt for suicide attack and vanish therein. It is undisputable fact that suicide bombing is fats shaping the face of terrorism.
Therefore suicide bombing is seen as a heroic act and the person carrying out the 'duty' is a loyal son or daughter of his/her religion and the person deserves praise or gratitude (theological view), on the other hand suicide bombing is in the deepest of the sense an evil act impression of cowardice and madness that violates every standard of human dignity and decency and the suicide bomber deserves sever condemnation from all spheres (Israel W. Charny, 2007).
To determine the best tactic to employ against terrorists organizations is a complicated problem. The optimal tactics therefore depends upon the target's response to the government's tactics and the scope and scale of indirect and unintended consequences. These factors in turn depend upon the structure of the insurgent organizations and the nature of the society in which it is embedded as noted by Michael McBride et al.,...
Terrorism Organizations What is Terrorism? Legacy in the 21st century Based Terrorist Organizations Aryan Nation Ku Klux Klan Counterterrorism and Prevention Definitions and Structures Homeland Security Patriot Act The very nature of terrorism, of course, is to engender fear and panic into the population base. Thus, targets are so numerous that complete protection of all is impossible. Targets could include any of the governmental buildings in Washington, D.C., courthouses or public buildings in major cities, malls, churches, and transportation centers
Terrorism refers to threats, violence, bombings, etc. Terrorism is known to have a long history, but even today, the reason behind this terror by the super powers and the government remains explicit. The acts of terror are very common these days and could be found in current political and social environment. A part of terror is still confused when it is applied in the actual present world (Robb, 2007). Where the
Terrorism Influences Terrorism has no specific definition and its definition largely depends upon the viewpoint of an individual for example Samuel Adams (a well-known revolutionary fireband) or Thomas Gefferson would have been terrorist from British perspective but they have been Great heroes from American perspective. Take the case of George Washington who was previously fighting with British army against French and was loyalist of British crown but later on he sought
Global Jihad, a Myth or Reality The Jihad is often associated with a certain Muslim fight against the unfaithful, one that has been going on for decades now and which is unlikely to stop in coming years. However, despite this sustainable development of the notion and everything it entangles, it cannot be stated without a doubt that this is an obvious reality. This assumption is made based on the fact that
Terrorism Annotated Bibliography Gardner, K.L. (2007). Fighting terrorism the FATF way. Global Governance: a Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations. (13:3). 325-45. FATF, or Financial Task Force, is considered a successful organization in terms of investigating how global terrorism is funded. Without financial backing, the complexities required that go into terrorism attacks would not be possible. Kathryn Gardner argues that other aspects of investigation into potential terrorist organization could benefit from
Terrorism The efforts to outdo terrorists are seemingly falling off, leaving with it underprivileged notion of the prospective for a proper psychological involvement to terrorist perception only. However, the bulk research within this circumference have brought about hopeful as well as exhilarating beginning for an intangible progress in coming to terms to psychological procedure transversely to all ranks of terrorist activities. An argument has come up for much considerable detachment with
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now