Verified Document

Suppressed Evidence Term Paper

Suppressed Evidence First Case. No. The passenger's motion to suppress the seized evidence should not be granted. An accurate description of the apprehension by the two police officers and the rocks of crack cocaine they confiscated from the passenger's pocket and body are fundamental evidence of illegal drug use. The passenger cannot claim any right to suppress the evidence because the actual substance was found in his personal possession and constitutes direct evidence against him. Moreover, the apprehension happened in a high-crime neighborhood where drug use is inherent or quite likely. By omitting or suppressing the direct evidence and presenting an incomplete or misleading account or description, the police officers or judge will commit obstruction of justice.

The driver was not arrested because no such evidence was found in his personal possession. The woman who leaned into the passenger's window and handed him an object was not arrested, either, because the police officers could not identify what the object was or tell if that was the plastic bag, containing the rocks of cocaine.

Convincing argumentation is premised on a basic principle that it presents all relevant evidence (Carroll 2003). Some omit relevant evidence to make the argument seem stronger, more convincing or to serve some other purpose. Evidence is suppressed when an arguer intentionally leaves out relevant data and it become a problem because or when there is no way to know if the whole truth is told. Advertisements commit this fallacy most often, such as when they do not inform the public about the dangers of a particular product unless the law requires it. One example is cigarette ads. Evidence is also suppressed when an ad does not inform the public that a competitor's product is equally good or better. Some coal, asbestos, nuclear fuel and tobacco industries deliberately suppressed evidence concerning the

All the included premises not only be true but must also include all true premises. Suppressed evidence leaves out true and relevant information and creates a fallacy. This fallacy is also called a fallacy of presumption in that it creates the presumption that the true premises are complete. Suppressed evidence is also called "unstated evidence (Atheism)." An audio tape case revealed a cover-up of the drug involvement of a sheriff's son who was then already on trial for a video-taped gang rape (Moxley 2003). Police officers suppressed the evidence of Assistant Sheriff Don Haidl's teenage son's smoking marijuana at the time his trial in a 200 videotaped gang rape of a 16-year-old girl in 2002 pended. Official records say that Assistant Sheriff George Jaramillo secretly arranged for and ordered Sgt. Richard Downing to conceal and bury the evidence against the sheriff's son. The Sheriff of the place where the drug bust was conducted released the teenager without arrest and even brought him home, chauffeured. Under the terms of his $100,000 bail for the rape case, a drug arrest would send him to jail immediately.
Second Case. No, the passenger's motion to suppress the controlled substance should not be granted. He or anyone had no right to such a motion, because intentionally suppressing evidence constitutes obstruction of justice, a crime. The police officer was doing routine check-ups of a troublesome bar in a high-crime area and it was his duty to report exactly what he found, especially if there was concrete and conclusive evidence to collaborate his description.

Having received calls from that bar for a full range of crimes from murder to public intoxication, police…

Sources used in this document:
BIBLIOGRAPHY

1. Atheism. Fallacies of Presumption: Suppressed Evidence. About, Inc., 2005. http://atheism.about.com/library/FAQs/Skepticism/faq_fall_suppressed.htm

2. Carroll, Robert Todd. The Fallacy of Suppressed Evidence. The Skeptics Dictionary. http://skepdic.com/refuge/ctlessons/lesson7.html

3. Medawar, Charles, interviewee. The Conspiracy of Silence: the Suppressed Evidence About Anti-Depressants. Multinational Monitor, July-August 2004. vol 25 (7 & 8). http://multinationalmonitor.org/mm2004/july-aug04/interviewmadewar.html

4. Soil Association. U.S. Public Interest Attorney Uncovers Suppressed Evidence of Potential GM Food Health Risks, February 28, 2000. http://www.soilassociation.org/web/sa/saweb_nsf/0/81256ad8005545498025689006614e1?OpenDocument
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Evidence in General Reciprocal Discovery
Words: 1386 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Mirfield 356) The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to afford the defendant all his or her rights of privacy and to maintain fair proceedings in the gathering of evidence. Unlawful search and seizure is a serious offence, committed by investigators and regardless of the value of the evidence recovered there is no clear acceptance of the principle as a tactic in a "fair" proceeding. If the police and/or prosecution was

Evidence-Based Practice EBP Is the Term That
Words: 895 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the term that refers to the need for nursing to be based on research that has been conducted in the most thorough scientific manner, consistently tested, rigorously proved, and only then published by peer-refereed academic journals. Evidence-based nursing is popular in nursing since it joins science with practice and bases nursing on a more critical scientific basis. It puts the nurse, so to speak, in the driver's

Evidence Criminal Evidence in Order
Words: 1380 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

The police officer then called the dispatcher to check Caballes' license and see if he had any outstanding warrants. As he was writing the warning ticket, he asked for a criminal background check from the dispatcher and asked Caballes if he had ever been arrested. Caballes said no, but the dispatcher told the officer that Caballes had been arrested twice for distribution of marijuana. While the officer was writing

Evidence in Criminal Law, the
Words: 1006 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

3) All of this evidence is admissible. Even if the police informant elicited the information in the jail cell when he was not uniformed so as to avail the defendant of the knowledge that he was talking to a cop, it is still admissible. This is the case even if the defendant requested council - the idea here is, confessions cannot be forced when a defendant believes he is under

Evidence Admission and Suppression
Words: 713 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Paper

Admissibility of Evidence at Trial If the goal for a trial is the search for justice, why should there be rules that limit a juror's ability to render a verdict only to that information gathered in compliance with the Constitution and approved by the judge? Part of the search for justice is making sure that the evidence admitted at trial satisfies the constitutional criteria distinguishing admissible evidence from inadmissible evidence. In large

Federal Rules of Evidence the
Words: 2542 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

Rule: Any out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted is generally inadmissible as hearsay. (801-802) However, hearsay may be admitted, in a prosecution for homicide or in a civil case, if the declarant, while believing the declarant's death to be imminent, made the statement about its cause or circumstances. (804(b)(2). Application: Here, the defense attorney's objection is premised on the fact that the deceased Sam's statements are

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now