Where, the actions of Iran and the relationship that they have with the country could become a liability. This is problematic, because it more than likely will mean that China will have to make a choice between conducting business with the Western nations and working with Iran. Given the fact that the West has greater economic opportunity; means that this underlying relationship could change, if China was forced to choose between the two sides. This is significant, because it shows the overall vulnerability that China will face because of this association. As the West, could force them to choose between: being a member of the world community or supporting an isolated Islamic Republic. (Mousavin 141 -- 172)
A third aspect of the changing association in Sino Iranian relations is: the desire for China to become a major player on the world stage. This is one of the biggest goals that the country has been striving to achieve, since it began to impose various economic reforms in the 1970's. The advances over the last several decades are helping China, to quickly realize this objective. That being said, the relationship that they have with Iran is causing many to question the motives and actions of the government. As many critics will claim that China is interested in their own self-interest vs. being a responsible member of the world community. Over the course of time, this could force China to abandon or reduce its relationship with Iran, as they feel that it has become a liability. Once this takes place, it can have negative consequences for Iran, as China could decide that it is causing too much strain. This is significant, because it shows how this desire to be a major player, could cause Iran to become burden, forcing the Chinese government to reevaluate the underlying levels of economic and military cooperation with the Islamic Republic. (Mousavin 141 -- 172)
When you look at the changing nature of this relationship, it is obvious that the actions taken by Iran could cause China to view them as a liability. This is important, because if Iran continues to defy the wishes of the international community, is when it may become advantageous for China to walk away from them. Given the fact that Iran is building a nuclear weapon and has refused to follow UN resolutions; means that this could, become very realistic possibility at some point in the future.
How this could have an impact upon future relations?
The association that China is having with Iran could have an impact upon its relations with the world community and trading partners. This is because Iran has been consistently seeking out nuclear technology sine the 1980's. The problem is that at the time, Iran was considered to be a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Under this agreement any nation that is perusing nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, can import and build their own facilities (to address their different energy needs). Once the IAEA visited various sites around the country, they would certify that Iran was seeking this technology for peaceful purposes during the early 1990's. Since the U.S. had economic sanctions against Iran, meant that they wanted to prevent the Islamic Republic from having access to this technology at all costs. This is problematic from the view point of China, as they felt that the U.S. objectives went beyond the provisions of the NPT agreement. Therefore, given the fact that IAEA would certify that the program was peaceful at the time; China would begin to export technology to Iran for this purpose. Throughout the 1990's and into the mid-2000's this issue would be an area of constant debate among American and Chinese officials. Where, the U.S. believed that China should never trade this kind of material and technology with the Islamic Republic. While China, does not understand the logic behind going beyond the provisions the NPT. This is important, because it shows the levels of contention between the West and China surrounding its relationship with Iran. As the U.S. believed that China should not share nuclear technology with them, whilst China felt that U.S. was attempting to tell them what to do. When you put these two different elements together, it would highlight the contentious relationship that China and the West would have surrounding nuclear proliferation. (Mederios 141 -- 172)
However, as...
" The withdrawal was supposed to aid the Communists in controlling the areas vacated by the Japanese, who had succeeded in controlling vast portions of Manchuria. Stalin's efforts were aimed at forcing "the GMD [Guomindang or Chinese Nationalist Party] to make economic concessions, to prevent a united China from allying with the United States, and to placate Washington on the international arena by giving in to American demands for withdrawal," but in
America's engagement with China, with historic ice-breaking between the two countries carried out by Henry Kissinger, has been complicated. I would suggest that it were the U.S. domestic preoccupations and compulsions that did not allow me to take any bold stance on the issue of Dalai Lama. I disagree with notion that U.S. betrayed the cause of human rights while not choosing to visit Dalai Lama. It must not be
history of China's importance to the U.S., from Nixon's visit to China in 1972 to the present, which contributed to the implementation of Obama's 'U.S. Pivot to Asia Strategy'? The Cold War represented one of the most important periods in the history of the world. It did not only changed the way in which the political world was configured following the end of the Second World War, but, at the
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now