Robotic drones have been in use by the United States as a strategy of attack against terrorist groups for several years now, beginning in the administration of George W. Bush. They have been effective and yet there is and has been controversy with the use of these robotic technologies. This paper will point to the criticisms and the supportive positions as well. In this paper the writer uses opinion articles by Daniel Byman and Kenneth Anderson to point to how drones actually work and to arguments against the continued use of drones as well as arguments in support of the policy of using drones.
This paper supports the use of drones as a very successful way to combat and kill certain key terrorist leaders who use violence to kill innocent people as they push their twisted Islamic ideologies on society. There is no doubt that innocent people have been killed during targeted drone strikes, and while that is very unfortunate -- and the U.S. should make reparations whenever possible -- that is not reason enough to shut down the program.
What are the advantages, the positives, of the drone program?
Byman makes the case that drones "have done their job remarkably well" and have "devastated al Qaeda," without putting U.S. forces in harm's way and at "little financial cost" (Byman, 2013). Byman correctly posits that the United States -- in a constant battle with terror groups in many parts of the world -- "…simply cannot tolerate terrorist safe havens in remote parts of Pakistan and elsewhere." The data that the New American Foundation has come up with through 2013 shows that 3,300 al Qaeda, Taliban and other terrorist operatives have been killed by drones, Byman points out (Byman, p. 2).
Of course Byman and Anderson published their articles before the ISIS terror movement had taken hold, and it would be interesting to see what each of them have to say about drones and ISIS. But meantime, Byman mentions how risky it is when the U.S. needs to "capture or eliminate an enemy"; even if the operation was a success, and a terrorist was captured, Byman wonders what the U.S. would do with the detainee, given that the problem...
U.S. National Strategy What three United States national interests do you think will be at great risk over the next five years? Describe those interests and identify which instruments of national power can be leveraged to protect or advance those national interests and how those instruments can be used. As President Obama stated in his addresses to Congress in February 2009, the most important problem that the country faced was the economy,
U.S. Approach to Terrorism U.S Approach to Terrorism Post 2001 The incidence of September 11, 2001 led to an anti-terrorism campaign by the government of U.S. And was called the war or terror. Since 2001, U.S. government has taken several steps to maintain security and counter terrorism by implementing certain strategies at national and international level. These approaches and steps, whether useful or not have been discussed in this paper. President Bush's Justifications
This category can further be divided into six subgroups namely; short-range, medium range, long-range, close range, endurance, Medium Altitude Long Endurance (MALE) Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). The long-range UAVs are technologically more advanced as they use satellites in order to overcome the communication problem between the UAVs and the ground stations. This communication problem is generally caused by the curvature of the earth. The medium, short and close range
Drone Strikes Target drone Legality International Law and Drone Strikes Obama Administration Drone attacks in Pakistan Drone Strikes in Yemen Drone Strikes in Somalia The legality of the drone strikes is a disputed matter. A major challenge to the international law and the international system is the U.S. policy of using drones aerially to carry out target killings. According to some reports U.S. drone strikes have killed almost 4,000 people since 2002 in Pakistan, Yemen and other countries.
As mentioned earlier, innocent men women and even children have become victim of these strikes. It was believed that in between 2004 and 2009, there have been a total of 344 strikes done. This number of strikes was under President Bush. Following that, under President Obama's presidency there were a total of 292 air strikes till 2012. It is quite obvious that the numbers have increased after President Obama
U.S. Policy and the War on Terror: An Ineffective Strategy Since 9/11 the U.S. government has pursued a policy of combating terrorism with all of its resources (intelligence, technology, military, economic sanctions, etc.). However, the question remains, nearly a decade and a half later, with terror attacks occurring more and more frequently around the world, whether the U.S. has been effective in its countering of terrorism. According to various studies, it
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now