¶ … classmates are ordinary citizens interested in science education. You have been assembled into an advisory group. The Virginia State Education Commission is drafting policy that will affect all school boards in the state. You are being protected in a secluded hotel from ACLU lawyers and right-wing demonstration groups. Here is your question: Is Intelligent Design theory scientific? The Commission is paying you thousands of dollars for a simple yes or no answer to this question. Such an answer may be unrealistic but court battles will follow. You need to get as close to a yes or no answer as possible!
As a group you have three reference sources:
• The course Presentation entitled "Origins, ID and the Public School Classroom"
• Two expensive expert witnesses: Michael Behe, a Lehigh University biochemist and Eugenia Scott of the National Center for Science Education. Your two expert witnesses come to you from presentations THE PRESENTATIONS ARE ON YOUTUBE THE FIRST IS Are there limits to Natural Science- Michael J. Behe. PHD and Eugenie Scott: Science is Agnostic Here are the links.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXo4VPJyz9w&feature=player_embedded
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=mJpYUxRL_3U
As panelists, first do your homework, then make a decision: based on how the scientific method works, is Intelligent Design theory scientific? Can you use it to do science?
The title should begin with the word "yes" or "no." Using three, concise, numbered sentences, argue your answer in the thread.
THIS THREAD SHOULD BE NO MORE THAN 100 WORDS. DON't WORRY ABOUT THE 2 PAGES Just has to be LESS than 100 words
Is Intelligent Design theory scientific?
NO.
Intelligent design is not technically a scientific theory -- intelligent design is not falsifiable and cannot be proven wrong with the contemporary understanding of the universe. However, there are limitations to science that cannot answer some of life's greatest questions and intelligent design is a coherent and reasonable theory that picks up where science leaves off. Although intelligent design is not technically a scientific theory, it is complimentary to the theories that science offers. Whereas science focuses on the specific biological mechanisms that allow for evolution, intelligent design explains why those mechanisms are in place to begin with.
But science is about stepping stones: the creation of theories and hypothesis, and the testing of these hypotheses with empiricism. If these theories fail, then additional hypotheses have to be proposed. During the process of the testing these hypothesis, experimentalists will find evidence based that will enable to fine tuning of the hypothesis, and the process carries on. Indeed, most of quantum theory is hinged on the Uncertainty principle
Intelligent Design Man has always asked questions about how the world began. All cultures in the ancient world had origin myths. People looked to higher powers, or deities, or life forces, to explain what they could not understand. Researchers do not know where humankind's need for spirituality comes from, but it is clear, looking at history, that faith and the need to believe in something greater than ourselves are part of
It has been shown that from a very simple spot that is an eye -- "barely a light receptor" -- all the way up the evolutionary chain to a human eye's present day sophistication. As to the argument that the ID advocates make that the during the "Cambrian explosion" there suddenly appeared these species with "unprecedented complexity" -- in point of fact that so-called "explosion" during the Cambrian epoch took
" It is just as true today. There are still many things that cannot be explained by science. The appearance of design is as powerful today as it was over two thousand years ago. That is especially true of the living world. The more that geneticists and biologists study, the more it is seen that the living world exists with amazing complexity and sophistication. The cell is a perfect example. In Darwin's
10)?" Indicating that there is no intellectual discourse on the subject, and, because they have already indicated that they perceive creationists as backward, asocial, and people essentially not capable of intellectual discourse on the subject; this book is done. However, and to the mystery of anyone who reads as far as the first ten pages of the book, the book lingers for more than 200 pages. Young and Edis begin
Although the Intelligent Design theory presents interesting objections, the idea that someone or some thing is absolutely necessary for every progressive development within a species fails to be prevalent through consistent testing of such debates. Intelligent Design provides much more theory than it does evidence; while evolutionism provides physical evidence to back its conceits. Yet, despite the stronger merit towards the evolutionist theory, schools should present both theories in
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now