¶ … Salem Witchcraft Scare
The social tensions that influenced the Salem Witchcraft Scare were based in politics and social class. Among the group that wanted Salem Village to be independent from Salem proper, were the Putmans, who formed their own church with Samuel Parris as its minister. Many of the wealthiest members of the village were among those who refused to attend meetings at Parris' church, and "refused even to assess taxes for the payment of Parris' 1692 salary" (Pestana 63).
The gender role had particular significance in the Witchcraft Scare. Seventy-eight percent of those accused of witchcraft in New England between 1620 and 1725 were female, and roughly half of the accused males were "suspect by association," meaning that they were the "husbands, sons, other kin, or public supporters of female witches" (Pestana 66). While, women who incriminated themselves were generally punished by death, men who incriminated themselves were whipped or fined "for telling a lie" (Pestana 66). Moreover, a substantial majority of the accused females were women without brothers, sons, or no children at all, thus "as women without brothers or women without sons, they stood in the way of the orderly transmission of property from one generation of males to another" (Pestana 68).
The typical woman accused was middle-aged, married with few or no children, practiced a medical vocation, and was considered outspoken, and "abrasive in style, contentious in character and stubbornly resilient in the face of adversity" (Pestana 71).
Salem had the largest concentration of Quakers in the county, thus a substantial number of the witches accused by the "afflicted girls" came from families or households that included Quaker members (Pestana 72). Since most of the accused lived in the more prosperous section, many villagers may have feared the "shorter physical distance separating the residences of the accused from the Salem's Quaker enclave" (Pestana 72).
Work Cited
Pestana, Carla Gardina. "The Salem Witchcraft Scare." Pp. 63, 66, 68, 71, 72.
Later most people admitted that they had overreacted to the situation and even Cotton Mather confessed that "errors" had been made in handling this crisis. The chief judge William Stoughton came under attack for his overzealous response to the accusations which led to many innocent deaths and false convictions. He however refused to shoulder any blame for the situation. Samuel Parris also did not accept his role in triggering
Satanic Abuse Representations in the Media and Social Science Literature Throughout history, few things have been able to literally scare the bejabbers out of people as much as reports of satanic abuse in general and in their own communities in particular. Indeed, based on various reports from Europe and North American over the past four centuries, it would seem that when Satan fell from Heaven, he fell directly into many
Witchcraft in the 16th & 17 Centuries: Response to Literature At first glance, a logical 21st Century explanation for the "witch craze" (also known as a witch-hunt) during the 16th and 17th centuries in Europe was based largely upon human ignorance. That is to say, the belief that a sub-culture of the general population performed witchcraft (and other magic-related phenomena), and ate the flesh of children, helped the unenlightened explain the
Crucible Dearest John, I am writing this letter in the hopes that I can explain myself and make you understand why I have done what I did. You are angry with me now and perhaps I deserve your anger, but you must know in your heart that your wife stood between us. We never could have been together so long as someone else called herself Mrs. John Proctor. That is a
American Crucibles The Crucible Contemporary World American Crucibles The playwright, Arthur Miller, was born on October 17, 1915 (Hinman et al., 1994). While studying journalism at the University of Michigan he began to write plays and win awards. With a strong interest in the plight of common man, it was inevitable that Miller, writing plays with a current of leftist ideology flowing through them, would capture the attention of the House Un-American Activities Committee
QUESTION #2: Was John Proctor essentially a good man? Yes, Proctor was a good man in his heart; he made a mistake by getting involved with Abigail, but when she came back to him hoping to rekindle the flame between them, he turned down the chance for another sexual liaison with a woman much younger than his wife. When the community began to turn hysterical, Proctor was a voice of
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now