Verified Document

Rhetoric Ethos Pathos And Logos Political Writing Analysis Essay

¶ … Mitt Romney and John McCain Denounce Donald Trump as a Danger to Democracy" on The New York Times website is framed by two images -- one, an image of the "religious family man" that the Times calls Mitt Romney; the other, an image of the "profane, philandering self-promoter" that it calls Donald Trump (Burns, Barbaro). Thus, while The Times attempts to give a balanced, objective viewpoint on the clash between the former Republican Presidential candidate (as well as the one before him -- John McCain) and the current Republican primary forerunner Donald Trump, it clearly sides with the campaign of Mitt Romney and the Establishment Republicans who resent being challenged by the "outsider" Trump. The New York Times has paid for this ad, which is essentially endorsed by the Republican elites who seek to wrest control of the Republican primary away from the frontrunner and put it into the hands of someone more malleable like Rubio or Cruz.

The main binaries of the article are the two former Candidates Romney and McCain and the frontrunner of today and likely Republican Presidential Candidate Donald Trump. On the one side are two failed bids for political power and on the other side is a momentum gaining rhino of a movement that threatens to overturn the establishment so long held dear by Republican elites. That Romney and McCain should voice denunciations against Trump is the height of hypocrisy and represents an implicit anomaly within the narrative offered in this article: why should the opinion of two failed candidates matter in a race that is clearly between PC (criminal) Culture (represented by Hillary Clinton) and non-PC (conservative) culture...

Also implicit in this narrative is the existence of two parties within the Republican party system -- the neo-conservative party, led by men such as Romney and McCain (and several others), and the old-school, traditional conservative party, now being led by Trump (with the support of hundreds of thousands of voters and pundits like Pat Buchannan and David Stockman).
While this article focuses mainly on how Trump is "dangerous" because of his stances on "trade" and "immigration," the article reveals the actual reason Trump is dangerous without really intending to do so when it describes David Duke as a "white supremacist." Duke is not a white supremacist and has said so on several occasions ("David Duke Responds to CNN - Speaks to Trump & All Americans") and this attempt to paint Duke as one by The Times covers up the fact that the real supremacists are those running the neo-conservative wing of the Republican Party -- in fact, Romney, McCain et al. The article's aim is to show how much division the Trump candidacy is causing and how bad it could be for the Party (i.e., the controlling neo-conservatives): The Times concludes that "There probably hasn't been this level of personal invective by one Republican nominee against another leading candidate," Mr. Greenberg said. "Ever" (Burns, Barbaro). The implication is that Trump is destroying an institution and causing an historic rift between Republican mainstays represented by Romney and McCain and the party voters.

The article does not attempt to establish the credibility of Trump at all: instead it focuses on sound bites and terms from Romney's assault on Trump's credibility and then selects a few, terse sound bites and terms from Trump's rebuttal to illustrate the dynamic of the exchange. The ad does not go into detail about either individual and simply seems to be about showing how a great feud or drama is in the works within the Party. However, a fuller description of either side would surely give weight to the picture and provide a clearer and more satisfying ethos. But this is lacking and the sense that the reader should come away with is…

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited

Burns, Alexander; Barbaro, Michael. "Mitt Romney and John McCain Denounce Donald

Trump as Danger to Democracy." The New York Times, 3 Mar 2016. Web. 5 Mar 2016.

"David Duke Responds to CNN - Speaks to Trump & All Americans." YouTube, 28 Feb

2016. Web. 5 Mar 2016.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Rhetorical Analysis Ethos Pathos Logos
Words: 1579 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

Ethos, Pathos, Logos About the Author -- Ethos Thomas L. Friedman, the winner of 2002 Pulitzer Prize for commentary, used to work as chief White House correspondent. He then joined Washington Bureau as chief economic correspondent. In 1995, he was selected as the foreign-affairs Op-Ed columnist of The New York Times. His fabulous work made him win the Pulitzer Prize 3rd time for The New York Times in 2002. Later on, in

Interpretation of Ethos, Pathos, and Logos
Words: 1227 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

encourage an audience that one's thoughts and concepts are effective, or more usable than someone else's. The Greek theorist Aristotle separated the means of influence, petitions, into three categories which are: Ethos, Pathos, Logos. The image interpreted in this essay, a lone figure pursuing a different path from the rest, with the caption: "My way…and no regrets…" is in a way a good representation of rhetorical strategies. One attempts

Inventing Argument: Rhetorical Analysis for
Words: 958 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

He seems to know what he is talking about and thus takes the reader into his circle of light almost immediately. At one point he makes a very effective and impressive use of logos when he appeals to logic with statements like: "The content of the doctrine is: "Yes, in the past we did some wrong things because of innocence or inadvertence. But now that's all over, so let's

History of Rhetoric and Rhetorical
Words: 5731 Length: 15 Document Type: Term Paper

While these are some of the more famous elements of rhetorical theory, they do not require extensive discussion here for two reasons. Firstly, they are fairly well-known. Secondly, and more importantly, they actually do not provide much insight into the uses of rhetoric, because Aristotle implicitly inserts an ethics into his discussion of rhetoric that precludes it from having as robust an application to the real world as would

Plato Was a Teacher of
Words: 1577 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

President Kennedy also used Aristotle's logic or logos to convince people to fight against public enemy such as poverty. JFK also used metaphor and the most famous sentence delivered after metaphor was "asks not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." (Nicholas, 2001 P. 283). The phrase was to appeal and persuade American people to devote their energy to the building

Grown More Mindful of How
Words: 1310 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

However, if I was rewriting my letter to Melfi, I would have used more research and included some specific citations, to substantiate my analysis. Drawing upon personal reflection is useful in appealing to the reader's sense of ethos or pathos, but logos is also necessary to be persuasive. I would have used statistics regarding the alcoholism rate amongst young people in the United States, for example, versus other countries. Although

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now