Verified Document

Polybius In Polybius' Histories He Term Paper

There must have been much more to the conflict than just the military tactical maneuvers and subsequent domestic responses that were made to the events of the war.
Polybius leaves out much of these details, or maybe he is not aware of the
details or they are not necessary to further his perspective and his goal
in writing his history. He writes that he, "shall, however, attempt to
narrate somewhat more carefully the first war between Rome and Carthage for
the possession of Sicily," meaning his story is just that at its core- a
narration of historical and military events (Polybius 35). Modern
historians delve much farther beneath the surface to find another level to
the conflict, one not rooted in simple cause and effects but as part of a
much bigger picture. Therefore any information as to Rome's expansionist
policies or eventually military growth, and even domestic reasons for
Rome's ascension to a world power would be much appreciated. Similar
information from the Carthaginian side would help as well, as two powers do
not engage in a war simply because of a local conflict or because it is one
power's destiny. There are other forces at work which Polybius does not
recognize or does not want to recognize as they would not further his goals
of the history.
In his histories, Polybius writes about the early days of the
Romans rise to power of the known world. He does so from the perspective
of the victor and this means that to him, Rome's accomplishments are
destined and great and to be celebrated. His perspective on history is a
reflection on this viewpoint. In particular,...

He sees things for what they are, but also he sees things from a Roman
perspective. A modern historian may consider the conflict between two
powers in the same region inevitable, but Polybius recounts the facts as if
they are the only thing that matters. While he is unbiased, there may also
be ulterior motives for his lack of bias. Ultimately, his history is
accurate, but lacking in important details that could have contributed to
the conflict. A modern perspective would look at realistic concerns of
international security, expansion, and political issues. Also, Rome may
have been expanding economically and needed to find new markets or areas
for production. There could have been a wide range of factors leading to a
war between two powers in this zero-sum game on Mediterranean power.
Polybius does not see it this way, however, as he is writing to Greeks
about Rome and for Rome's expansion to be for greed related motives would
reflect bad on the fact that his people were conquered for political or
economic motives. Instead, he portrays the Roman expansion as inevitable
destiny which means that Rome has a right and it is justified that the
former power of Greece is now under Roman influence.

Works Cited
Polybius: the Histories. LacusCurtius. 18 Apr. 2007
.

"Roman History Timeline." UNRV History. 2007. 18 Apr. 2007
.

Sources used in this document:
Works Cited
Polybius: the Histories. LacusCurtius. 18 Apr. 2007
<http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Polybius/home.html>.

"Roman History Timeline." UNRV History. 2007. 18 Apr. 2007
<http://www.unrv.com/empire/early-roman-timeline.php>.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Polybius Was a Distinguished Green
Words: 936 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Harris (1979) noted that the work of Polybius on Roman Imperialism can be viewed to be a much more closer/realistic account of the process that any other 20th century historians. Polybius was therefore very honest and at the same time reliable with his work on Roman history (Davidson, 1991, p.10). Polybius' contribution to the establishment of the U.S. constitution The contribution of Polybius to the establishment of the U.S. constitution is

Polybius Historian and Politician
Words: 3811 Length: 12 Document Type: Research Paper

Polybius: Historian and Politician Louis XIV The histories written by Polybius are considered to be essential from historiographic perspective as it gives detailed and comprehensive picture and understanding of the Hellenistic world. His work on the rise and fall of the Roman Empire are considered to be one of the most important and significant works in the field of classical history.[footnoteRef:1] The aim of this research is to investigate and study the

Polybius's Histories Form a Canon
Words: 599 Length: 2 Document Type: Research Proposal

Viewing the broad forces involved in such militaristic affairs rather than focusing overly much on the details, Polybius is one of the first historians to have given us historiographical methodologies and tools. At the same time, Polybius did offer detailed chronicles that contribute to an understanding of chronology and geography. On several interrelated levels, the work of Polybius forms a crucial part of the classical historiography. The areas that I

Roman in the Context of
Words: 2320 Length: 8 Document Type: Term Paper

And an owner could set his slave free as a reward for that slave's noble service, transforming this piece of property into a human being with a touch of the hands and a few words. Plautus depicts the absurdity of this legal reality with a humorous edge, but his humor has a great deal of societal bite. Plautus' most famous play, which provides the plot of "A Funny Thing Happened

The Carthage and Roman Wars
Words: 920 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Paper

Second Punic War The Punic wars, a total of three wars were violent clashes that took place between Rome and Carthage and spanned across a timeline of almost a Century starting from 264 BC and ending in 146 BC with the destruction of Carthage. During this time, Rome had established itself as the dominant power across the Italian Peninsula while Carthage was a powerful city state that was in Northern

Rome One Could Be Important in Roman
Words: 5688 Length: 12 Document Type: Essay

Rome One could be important in Roman society either by doing something great, or simply by being born into high status. In other words, Romans valued both accomplishment and privilege. Which of these two do you think was more prominent in Roman society? Argue for one over against the other. Your argument must incorporate an analysis of two things: a specific historical event or institution, and the point-of-view of a Roman

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now