Verified Document

Plea Bargaining System In The Term Paper

" However, in 1852, the Massachusetts legislature removed the prosecution's power to nol pros without the judge's consent. This eliminated the prosecution's key leverage over defendants in liquor cases: the power to charge and then drop some charges in exchange for a plea. Sure enough, the number of clear plea bargains dropped dramatically, and the number of trials increased concomitantly (Fisher, 2003)."

BENEFITS

There are numerous benefits to using the plea bargain system. The first and most important benefit from the standpoint of a prosecutor is the fact that it provides an automatic conviction. The prosecution does not have to worry about whether the evidence will hold up under the scrutiny of the system. They have to wonder if their witnesses will be believable during a traditional trial. In addition the prosecution is always at the mercy of the jury members. Jury members are human and subject to human emotion and error. A prosecutor faced with a trial will always be concerned that the jury will feel sorry for the defendant and even if convinced that the defendant committed the crime will acquit or provide a not guilty verdict.

All of these elements come into play when a defendant chooses to go to trial.

The plea bargain method also saves a significant amount of time and money. A trial involves not only the time and services of the government provided prosecution, it also often involves the expense of hiring expert witnesses and their accommodations during the trial period. The cost of legal investigations are also born by the state and federal taxpayers and can be quite costly.

The benefits of the plea bargain system far outweigh the negative elements of its use but there are some negative elements involved.

NEGATIVE ELEMENTS

When one decides to use a plea bargain arrangement rather than go to trial it...

While a plea bargain saves time and money for the taxpayers it often mandates that the defendant receive a lesser conviction and sentence than he or she would have received if a conviction from a full trial would obtain.
The victims and their families may feel that the plea bargain did not properly punish the defendant for the crimes committed against them.

The second negative aspect of the plea bargain system is the fact that it often creates the early release of the convicted defendant.

If a defendant is accused of a crime that would normally receive 25 years to life and the attorneys work out a plea bargain that person could feasibly be back on the streets in five to ten years to commit more crimes.

THE COMPARISON

While the pleas bargain system can create a situation in which criminals are released earlier than they would have been had they been convicted in a trial, the risk of trial and the defendant going free because of factors other than the defendant's guilt.

While there are pros and cons to the system the benefits far outweigh the negative elements because of the time and money that the system saves. It also provides as sure conviction with no possibility of the defendant walking free. As the courtrooms continue to have overflowing dockets the use of plea bargaining will most likely continue to grow with positive results to the nation's judicial system.

References

Sanderfur, Timothy (2003) In defense of plea bargaining: the practice is flawed, but not unconstitutional.(Law) of Gorr, Michael (2000) The Morality of Plea Bargaining.

Social Theory and Practice

Carney, David (1999) Waiver of the right to appeal sentencing in plea agreements with the federal government. William and Mary Law Review

Sources used in this document:
References

Sanderfur, Timothy (2003) In defense of plea bargaining: the practice is flawed, but not unconstitutional.(Law) of Gorr, Michael (2000) The Morality of Plea Bargaining.

Social Theory and Practice

Carney, David (1999) Waiver of the right to appeal sentencing in plea agreements with the federal government. William and Mary Law Review
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Plea Bargaining in the United States
Words: 1906 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Benefits From Plea Bargaining? Although the U.S. Constitution guarantees all defendants a trial by jury, individuals entering the criminal justice system today have about a one-in-twenty chance of actually undergoing a trial, with the rest of the cases being plea bargained away. While this approach facilitates the disposition of cases in already overbooked courtrooms, plea bargaining has been the source of a growing amount of criticism as a result of

Plea Bargaining Pleading for Justice Plea Bargaining
Words: 1236 Length: 4 Document Type: Essay

Plea Bargaining Pleading for Justice Plea bargaining by its very nature implies negotiation, which in turn means that two or more parties are seeking to achieve specific goals with the cooperation of the other parties. In the absence of plea bargaining the parties would face each other in court as adversaries in front of a referee and their conduct and the trial's proceedings would be strictly controlled according to the law and

Plea Bargaining: What Does It
Words: 2084 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

The ethical considerations have been addressed in the survey by the elements of the plea bargain provided to the individuals surveyed. Herzog's study shall serve as the model for the study proposed here. This study should serve anyone interested in understanding the public opinion and perceptions as they relate to plea bargaining. References (recommended) www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5013705813 Bibas, S. (2005). White-Collar Plea Bargaining and Sentencing after Booker. William and Mary Law Review, 47(3), 721+.

Plea Bargaining, Otherwise Known As:
Words: 3023 Length: 8 Document Type: Research Proposal

" This means that, "It is an indictment of the criminal justice system, not plea bargaining itself" (Sandefur, 2003, p. 31). The Constitution incorporated the right to a trial into the process, and it does not necessarily entail that: the defendant needs to know his rights in waiving them or hiring a legal counsel to help. Sandefur finally stated that, "Plea bargaining is not perfect, but its problems are procedures

Plea Bargaining and Crime
Words: 909 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Plea Bargaining Many criminal cases are often resolved out of court through agreement between the aggrieved party and the offender. The process of achieving such a settlement is referred to as Plea Bargain in law. It is a practice that is used in many jurisdictions to resolve cases. Either of the sides in the case may initiate the Plea bargain process. Both sides have to agree before such a process succeeds

History Plea Bargaining When 2. What
Words: 994 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

history plea bargaining? When ? 2. What recent statistics plea bargaining U.S. ( current year)? What Bargaining With Pleas The history of plea bargaining can be traced back to the end of the colonial era in the United States. Plea bargaining was known to exist in this country since at least 1780, a fact that is corroborated by author George Fisher. Fisher dedicated a significant amount of research to the history

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now