Verified Document

Pinto/Ford The Ford Pinto: Case Business Plan

Because it was deemed to cost too much, relative to the target price of the car, Iacocca negated the proposed mechanical reform. "Safety doesn't sell," was his motto. The Pinto was deemed acceptable for the roads because it was a 1971 model and new National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) regulations regarding vehicle safety that would have prevented the release of the Pinto were not passed until 1977.

The 'pros,' however, of avoiding lawsuits seem obvious in retrospect, but within the hothouse managerial atmosphere at Ford, the focus on increasing sales and the bottom line was nearly obsessive, as was meeting set benchmarks.

Feasibility of alternatives

What grabbed the public's attention about the Pinto, in addition to Ford's rigid actuarial calculations of how many lawsuits were likely to ensue per customer death, was the fact that the safety mechanism was so inexpensive and easy for Ford to install. The only reason not to include it, from a feasibility perspective, was because of the company's idea that cost and meeting Iacocca's inflexible deadlines were non-negotiable.

Decide on the valid alternative and make recommendations, agenda of corrective actions

Installing the $11 valve upon the Pinto's release would have prevented Ford from losing sales across the board. Ford's feeble protests that companies make cost-benefit analyses all the time regarding customer safety rang hollow, given the horrific nature of the Pinto crashes and the carnage (third-degree burns all over a young boy's body; the deaths of young girls) that subsequently ensued. The argument that actuarial predictions suggested that 'only 180' lives...

To prevent fiascos like the Pinto, Ford executives would have had to have included an analysis of how perception could affect sales. Even if safety did not 'sell' in the sense that consumers would buy a vehicle simply because it was safe, which did not make the reverse true, that consumers would buy a vehicle that was demonstrably unsafe.
Are recommendations workable and affordable?

Tragically, the modifications to the Pinto that could have saved many lives were both workable and affordable. The mechanism to prevent the exploding gas tank would have only cost $11, and would have resulted in a delay of the car's release that would have been far less cumbersome for Ford than the recall, the time and effort put into court cases, and the need to fight the negative publicity against the company in the media. Ford's reputation as a company that cared about its drivers was damaged for many years.

Additionally, Ford knew that it would eventually have to adopt the required standard, due to pending changes in the law. After 1977, all Pintos had to have a rupture-proof fuel tank design. Ford's decision was clearly taken as part of a marketing ploy to stress the cheapness of the Pinto, and to fulfill Iacocca's arbitrarily set numerical figure of $2,000.

Sources used in this document:
Are recommendations workable and affordable?

Tragically, the modifications to the Pinto that could have saved many lives were both workable and affordable. The mechanism to prevent the exploding gas tank would have only cost $11, and would have resulted in a delay of the car's release that would have been far less cumbersome for Ford than the recall, the time and effort put into court cases, and the need to fight the negative publicity against the company in the media. Ford's reputation as a company that cared about its drivers was damaged for many years.

Additionally, Ford knew that it would eventually have to adopt the required standard, due to pending changes in the law. After 1977, all Pintos had to have a rupture-proof fuel tank design. Ford's decision was clearly taken as part of a marketing ploy to stress the cheapness of the Pinto, and to fulfill Iacocca's arbitrarily set numerical figure of $2,000.
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Ford Pinto -- Case Analysis on August
Words: 1188 Length: 4 Document Type: Case Study

Ford Pinto -- Case Analysis On August 10, 1978 a group composed of three young women, two were eighteen and one was sixteen, were the subject of a rear end automobile accident by another vehicle while driving in a 1973 Ford Pinto (Epstein, 1980). The car was engulfed in flames due to an explosion in the gas tank of the car and the three young women lost their lives in a

Ethics the Ford Pinto Case Offers an
Words: 1587 Length: 5 Document Type: Essay

Ethics The Ford Pinto case offers an ideal opportunity to apply utilitarian ethics to a real world situation. First, it is important to list the actors and stakeholders in this case. Lee Iacocca was the leader of the Ford Motor Company. He is credited with creating the inflexible parameters for the Pinto automobile as weighing no more than 2000 pounds and costing no more than $2,000. Therefore, the utilitarian analysis can

Ford Case Study Discussion & Executive Summary
Words: 758 Length: 2 Document Type: Case Study

FORD Case Study Discussion & Executive Summary Objectives Identify ethical problems faced managers. Apply steps ethical moral decision-making address management issues. Use ethical perspectives make management decisions. Ford Pinto case study discussion & executive summary Managers must continually balance their own, personal sense of ethics with the need to render a company profitable. In the case of Ford, the pressure to create an affordable car resulted in the company making unethical decisions that

Ford Pinto
Words: 2857 Length: 8 Document Type: Essay

Ford Pinto What happened to the Ford Pinto? Ford Motor Company had intended to compete with other automobiles on the market that were smaller and used less gas. But something went terribly wrong along the way. This paper explores the details that led ultimately to the demise of the Ford Pinto -- and to the deaths and injuries of innocent consumers. Why was the Pinto developed in the first place? Ford Motor

Pinto Ethics Deontological and Utilitarian
Words: 868 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Legally, forcing Ford to make costly payments to the families of the victims of its maleficent inaction was good for society as well as for the individuals who were harmed. Companies are less likely to make such criminally negligent risk/benefit calculations when they know the legal system will penalize the organization financially and legally. Only by increasing the hazardous potential of financial loss from acting immorally can the tort system

Pinto Automobile Makers Are Responsible
Words: 1813 Length: 6 Document Type: Term Paper

Unfortunately, many companies and industries have not learned from the mistakes of the Ford company; as this is an issue that continues to happen with a number of large companies. A prime example of an industry that continues to use a cost benefit analysis even when it involves human life is the airline industry. Many companies within the industry have known in the past that some parts of the

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now