Creation Science
As a student taking an earth science class from a conservative, evangelical Christian institution of higher education, I am interested in the debate between creationist and evolutionists. Honestly, I enter into this course with some serious misgivings about some of the basic tenets of young earth creationism based on what I have been taught in a non-religious scientific context. I also, however, have some concerns about what I have been taught about old-earth evolutionary science as it seems to ignore the presence of God, which not only flies in the face of Christian theology, but also in the face of evidence of a historical belief in deities that seems to be part of human nature and would not make sense in a world without a higher power. As a result, I am left with several different specific questions in the young-earth / old earth debate. The first specific issue is the church's history of being wrong about scientific facts as they relate to earth science. The second specific issue is the age of the earth. The third specific...
The fourth specific issue involves the spread of humanity that cannot be accounted for by solely examining the biblical record.
My first concern in taking a literalist interpretation of earth science based solely on the Bible is based in the fact that science has established that biblical accounts that were once taken as facts about the earth are wrong. The two most notable of these facts that come to mind are the notion that the Earth is flat and the notion that the sun orbits around the Earth. It has been established, beyond any type of reasonable doubt, and verifiable with proof that the world is not flat, despite repeated references in the Bible to the corners of the Earth or the edge of the Earth. The fact that people and satellites are able to orbit a round Earth and provide photos of that Earth belies the notion of an Earth that is flat. Furthermore, a literalist interpretation suggests that this language cannot merely…
