Verified Document

Non-Violent Philosophy Of Mahatma Gandhi Thesis

This indicates that society is not safe as the result of the death penalty, so long as life in prison is a real and fully-enforced option for prisoners who commit terrible crimes. There is also the very real issue of innocent people who are murdered by the state. Of course, some proponents of capital punishment argue that from a utilitarian point-of-view, more guilty people are executed than innocent people. But an equally rational utilitarian point-of-view is that when it is discovered that the state has killed an innocent person, respect for the state and the judicial process as a whole is damaged. When no one respects the judicial process, crime is likely to increase. Further damage to the social perception of the justice system is incurred by the fact that more non-whites are executed than whites, which suggests that racial biases on the part of juries and lack of access to adequate representation results in two justice systems, one for minorities and one for the dominant ethnic group.

This argument is particularly compelling in a diverse society such as Canada's, which, even though it does not have as deep-seated a history of racial discrimination as the United States, has a wide variety of native peoples, immigrants from Asia, French-speakers, and other minority groups. It does not want to create further divisiveness in society, and it hardly needs the added financial expense and strain upon its judicial...

No active medications will be administered to the patient, although medically necessary treatment will not be given so the patient will pass away from her illness. While Kant himself argued that suicide is degrading because human life should be embraced in its full capacity, as a source of pain as well as pleasure, and that the categorical imperative necessitates that life must always be preserved, Neo-Kantians would say that showing respect Olivia's wishes necessitates a withdrawal of added support, including medication for pneumonia. Olivia was clearly aware of what life as an Alzheimer's patient was like, and gave a medical directive to ensure that her wishes were obeyed.
A Kantian might respond that Olivia's current state of personhood, rather than her past state of personhood should be heeded. After all, no one can fully appreciate the consequences of his or her actions 'in the moment,' and Olivia could not have apprehended her future state of personhood. She might have some contentment from her life. As we cannot know, life must be preserved. Also, we cannot know how much of 'personhood' Olivia currently retains. But a Neo-Kantian might respond that it is uncertain if she experiences pain or pleasure, or the ability to embrace life as Kant decreed at all, thus what is certain should be respected, in the form of her living will.

A Neo-Kantian would also argue that to show full respect to Olivia's human dignity, from what we know of it, her wishes should be respected. We cannot know what Olivia, with her full capacities, would think of her current state, but from what she did know, and was capable of knowing of the illness at the time, she made a decision. Thus, the principle of autonomy must be respected, as every patient must have a certain degree of choice over his or her life, provided he or she is in full possession of his or her faculties.

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Gandhi's Philosophies Mahatma Gandhi Is Still One
Words: 602 Length: 2 Document Type: Essay

Gandhi's Philosophies Mahatma Gandhi is still one of the most influential spiritual and political leaders ever to have made his presence known to the world. Through his fight for independence using non-violent resistance, Gandhi spread the word of gaining independence without loosing one's dignity or pride in the midst of a bloody struggle. His principles were based of the piousness of spirituality, and therefore aim to help guide individuals to truth

Gandhi Mahatma Gandhi Was One
Words: 2159 Length: 7 Document Type: Thesis

Gandhi also possessed this leadership skill. People listened to Gandhi even when they were not in agreement with what he was trying to convey. Law of respect-Gandhi respected others even when they did not respect him. In return, people respected Gandhi, even many of the people responsible for his many persecutions came to respect him. Law of Navigation- Gandhi had an ability to organize people and delegate responsibilities and he had

Gandhi Mahatma Gandhi Was Mohandas
Words: 2754 Length: 9 Document Type: Term Paper

If the person reacts with hatred or anger, he gets no immediate relief and instead develops a negative attitude and feeling, which will lead to his own downfall. The generation of hatred and hateful thoughts produces undesirable forms of existence in future lives and also creates a distorted image of the person who harbors that hatred. Others can sense it and even experience steam of hostility coming out of

Mahatma Gandhi
Words: 1325 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Mahatma Gandhi was a great leader who dreamt of making India an independent state, which would be free from the British rule. From 1917 to 1947, Mahatma Gandhi has been a great leader and has worked to make his dream true. His non-co-operation movements and the famous Salt March are few examples of his life which are significant enough to express his identity (Metcalf and Metcalf, 2006). Gandhi had very aggressive

Gandhi's Perception of His Religion
Words: 3295 Length: 9 Document Type: Term Paper

In 1934, they created the Government of India Act, "which allowed large areas to govern themselves with a degree of local independence" (Leathem 8). During the war, the government reduced many freedoms, and Gandhi and his followers continued to protest British intervention. During the war, Gandhi was jailed several times, and once, his wife protested so she would be jailed alongside her husband. Gandhi's health began to deteriorate as

Civil Disobedience: Mahatmas Gandhi &
Words: 1678 Length: 5 Document Type: Term Paper

.. becomes unjust" (Lincoln 158). Here, King is referring to the Civil Rights movement and its non-violent protest which in the minds of the lawmakers disrupted and desegregated society by allowing blacks to interrelate with the Southern majority who keenly believed in the separation of the races. In addition, King brings his argument against unjust laws full circle by declaring "One who breaks an unjust law must do it openly,

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now