Verified Document

Neo-Realism And Neo-Liberalism Parenting Styles Term Paper

On the other hand, Neo-liberalists view of international relations as something that shapes and influences the foreign policies of states, therefore further strengthening interconnections between them. Another point is concerned with the power of the military. The point-of-view of Neo-realists on the coercive power of the military is that it is the most important factor in order for the state to survive. But Neo-liberalists claim that military power is not the sole tool for state survival, other foreign political tools can be more fundamental for the common interests of the states.

Globalization is one change in the society where difference between Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism can be observed. For Neo-realists, states play the most important role in the IR theory. It is primarily dominated by relations between states, thus globalization does not really exist. Neo-realists are more concerned with the topics on security, inequality and conflict arising from uneven globalization.

For Neo-liberalists, they see globalization as the reality and as a positive process. They see globalization as the...

Thus, globalization shouldn't be directed or manipulated. But still, other Neo-liberalists still suggest intervention on situations and crises in other states with regards to open markets, capitalism and democracy.
In general, the two theories agree in some basic points, that anarchy is at the core of international relations, and that states are the most important international actors. But in the 1970s, Liberalists and Realists have closed the gap between them. Through the interaction and intermingling of Neorealism and Neoliberalism, a Neo-Neo synthesis can be seen at present.

References

Mearsheimer, John J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, NY: Norton.

Waltz, Kenneth Neal (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/53

http://fsinternationalrelations.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/924-neo-realism-vs.-neo-liberalism / http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9055278/Neorealism

http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/neoliberalism.html

Sources used in this document:
References

Mearsheimer, John J. (2001). The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York, NY: Norton.

Waltz, Kenneth Neal (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co. http://natsecorma.net/terje/archives/53

http://fsinternationalrelations.wordpress.com/2007/09/25/924-neo-realism-vs.-neo-liberalism / http://www.britannica.com/eb/article-9055278/Neorealism

http://web.inter.nl.net/users/Paul.Treanor/neoliberalism.html
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Personal Philo. One of the
Words: 2584 Length: 8 Document Type: Research Paper

" (7) Chomsky warns of ideological motivations of some scientific paradigms, just as with the aforementioned racial emphasis of early anthropology. Here, Russell espouses a Platonic episteme by enunciating the expectations of behavior between different classes. While Plato philosophized that persons are born with the characteristics fitting of their caste, Russell envisages a society in which "ordinary" men and women are expected to be collectivized and, therefore, devoid of individual expression. Jean

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now