Nature of Intelligence
In the world of global diversity, creativity, sustainability and computer technologies it seems hard not to assume that the multiple theory of intelligence is preferable to the more general one. Naturalistic, verbal, musical and interpersonal examples of this type of thinking seem more aligned with the way we see the universe today (Gardner, H., 2003).
On the other hand, the educational system in the country is acting as if it believes the model of general intelligence is necessary for academic success. The movement toward young people being taught highly standardized school subjects so that they can all take similar tests matches this assumption because it allows for using scientific tools to measure achievement and one's supposed intelligence. It was this philosophy that allowed Spearman and others to first use their ideas of finding common personal characteristics to identify intelligence (Gottfredson, 1998). Eventually this would be the foundation for building the IQ numerical ratings that we still use in many circumstances today.
This type of thinking can still be seen in government and business efforts today that focus on emphasizing science and mathematics, or what is sometimes called STEM programs -- Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics. The driving force behind this is the assumption that these fields are true sciences that showcase how well students can compete with others all around the world. This belief assumes that in using this standard approach, students will have a common basis for getting good word in the future. (See STEM Fields, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STEM_fields.)
It's interesting to note, however, that some of the most successful companies these days are actually looking for more creative employees, those whose innovative abilities tend to work best in developing creative products using high technology, communications and connectivity (like Apple). These kinds of businesses recognize that to be successful in this type of enterprising environment, it is important to recognize, reward and even cater to those who think and act differently. Businesses are starting to fight to get talented and intelligent people. And they often do this by making their companies more open and equal to new approaches, even if that means developing resources that recognize unique examples of intelligence. This approach flies in the face of the standardized testing and classifying of people based on single intelligence ideas.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.