• Home
  • /
  • Topic
  • /
  • Law
  • /
  • Law
  • /
  • Law Report Case Study the Supreme Court Case Study
Verified Document

Law Report Case Study The Supreme Court Case Study

Law Report Case Study The Supreme Court of New South Wales heard the case Pastizzi Cafe v Hossain in mid-July of 2011. The case involved a variety of different legal issues -- issues that ranged from what constitutes a business partnership to whether a partner can end a corporation on her or his own without the consent of other partners. In this case, the main parties are Deborah Ross, Leonard Ross and Miraj Hossain and the three reached an agreement to create and administer a restaurant called Pastizzi Cafe Pty Ltd. There are a number of unique twists and fact in this particular controversy. To start, there is a Ms Ross who is guarantor of the partnership's initial funding, and she is a shareholder of the corporation as well. There is a Mr. Ross who is not a formal partner (his partnership is on hold for two years due to a break up with a former girlfriend,) and there is a Mr. Hossain and his company, Talukder Enterprises Pty Ltd. (Pastizzi Cafe v Hossain, 4). Mr. Hossain complains to the Court that Mr. And Ms Ross are making all business decisions while leaving him out of the decision-making...

Parts of this document are hidden

View Full Document
svg-one

Of course, Mr. And Ms Ross do not agree, since he can come to corporate meetings and since he has access to all the partnership's financial documents (Pastizzi Cafe v Hossain, 4). Another problem that complicates the case is the fact that Mr., Hossain sold his third of the partnership to Mr. And Ms Ross in late 2010. They disagreed on the value of the business at this time, however. To make matters worse, several months later, Mr. Hossain locks the Rosses out of the restaurant, changes the name, and ends the partnership. Because of this, Mr. And Ms Ross sue Mr. Hossain for lost profits and damages due to loss of the businesses goodwill (Pastizzi Cafe v Hossain, 5).
Though there are several interesting minor legal questions (the case involving Mr. Ross and his former girlfriend, for example,) the main legal questions involve the nature of the partnership, the right of Hossain kick the Mr. And Ms Ross off of his (and Pastizzi's) property and end the partnership, and the value of the business and the damages for lost profit and goodwill.

First, the Supreme…

Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Law and Society
Words: 909 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Law and Society The Nature of Law and Justice - Sadomasochism Sadomasochism presents the complexities and nuances involved in the nature of law and justice. In its purest definition, socially and legally, sadomasochism is a consensual act. There may even be actual contracts involved. However, this presentation shows that just because there is consent to the act, doesn't mean that the dominant can get away with anything. In cases in which the

Law Vs. Justice Is Defined
Words: 2191 Length: 7 Document Type: Term Paper

Oliver Wendell Holmes states that justice is subjective and changes according to the viewer's prejudice, viewpoint or social affiliation. But a set of rules is needed to make society function and these rules must be carried out. This philosophy of law applies to Ann Hopkins' case. The senior partner and admissions committee had the prerogative of setting out the rules with which partners should be selected. Their sense of justice

Law School Personal Statement I
Words: 835 Length: 3 Document Type: Research Proposal

I just like accumulating knowledge and my professional career has shown that you never can really know where you will be needing parts of that knowledge: I worked as a machinist for some time, but then I was able to promote because of the additional knowledge I had gained in the meantime. I hope that the education I will receive in law school would help improve my knowledge portfolio to

Law and Philosophy
Words: 322 Length: 1 Document Type: Term Paper

Law and Philosophy Holmes' "bad man" theory offers insight into the difference between the law and morality. The bad man is not concerned with morality but he is as concerned about the law as any "good" man because in knowing the law, he can avoid getting into trouble. The bad man would lie, cheat, and/or steal if it weren't against the law because he cares not for the morals that underlie

Law Movie Analysis and Research
Words: 1566 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

However, Erin Brockovich the movie has a very different ending than the actual civil action under tort law brought against California's Pacific Gas and Electric Co. The Hollywood ending would have been preferable, however life is just not that simple and a tort law case against such a company is really a long, tiring legal battle. The 1993 legal dispute from Hinkley was resolved by arbitrage and at first

Laws of Corrections When Someone
Words: 1503 Length: 5 Document Type: Case Study

The fact that a guard was able to take information from a prisoner's cell, and give it to prosecutors is a clear violation of basic procedures. As a result, greater amounts of oversight are required to prevent these issues from becoming a problem in the future. ("Deon Christopher Carter v State of Maryland," 2003) Conclusion Clearly, the evidence that was collected from Jones' cell is a violation of the Sixth Amendment.

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now