A company that is not part of IT may not have adopted the term, because it does not mean the same thing to every person. Even in their disagreement, individuals like Wilson (2002) and Harsh (2009) both bring good points to the table. They indicate that they have examined the ideas behind knowledge management. From that point they have taken data and used it to create a picture of the validity of the term and what it means for individuals and companies. Both sides of the issue are to be respected when they present their information clearly and knowledgeably. From that information, businesses can take what they want and leave the rest. They can agree to disagree, which allows them to move forward and focus on the best ways to increase their revenue and build their business into something that is valuable and successful. Regardless of what they call the knowledge...
(2009) Three dimensional knowledge management and explicit knowledge re-use. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 10(2). Retrieved November 14, 2010, from http://www.tlainc.com/articl187.htmOur semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now