At the same time, opponents would argue that Israel should be talking and negotiating with their neighbors, to avoid similar kinds of conflicts. This is important, because these views would have an impact upon various military operations and foreign policy actions taken in the future. A good example of this can be seen with the events surrounding the Six Day War in 1967. What happened was, Ben Gurion had continually argued for Israel to use self restraint in international affairs. The problem was that the Arabs would use this as way to attack Israel. For many conservatives, this was a continuation of the same policies, as the inactions from the Mapai party would make the security situation worse. Where, many conservatives would argue that these actions were similar to the inability of many Jews to stand up to Nazi oppression. In 1967 when the conservatives were in power, they would conduct a preemptive strike against: Egypt, Syria and Jordan. This would result, in sizeable gains in territory, because they were proactive in dealing with the problem. (Schlindler 123- 146) This is significant, because it shows how the Kastner trial would change politics in the future. As many individuals would often draw parallels to what happened during the Holocaust with modern day events. This would reshape how the Israeli government would interact with its neighbors and the world community. Where, there would be this constant struggle between the policy of restraint and taking actions to prevent a repeat of the Holocaust. Clearly, the actions taken by Kastner in Hungary during 1944 would save the lives of over 1,600 Jews. While they are somewhat questionable, the fact of the matter is that he was attempting to make the most out of a difficult situation. This was confirmed when he originally investigated for possibly helping the Nazis and was cleared in1950. Then, the Supreme Court ruling indicates how the trial had become a spectacle. Where, conservatives would attempt to paint these individuals as traitors, when they were trying to do the right thing. This would have a profound impact upon Israeli...
As the issue of self restraint and negation, would continually be brought to the forefront. At the heart of this matter, is how the government should be acting towards possible hostilities from its neighbors. Where, one group of individual (lead by the conservatives) will argue that they only way to deal with these situations is proactively. If this kind of solution had been implemented during the Holocaust (they argue), it would have a profound impact upon the event itself. As Nazi forces, would have a miniature insurgency because of their brutality and the policies they were implementing. At the same time, you have those voices who say that restraint should be used; as such actions will more than likely make the situation worse. In this aspect, they claim that if this kind of strategy was utilized during the Holocaust, it would have meant that even more people would have died. This significant, because it shows the conflict that occurs in Israeli politics / society, as the Kastner trial would highlight these two different viewpoints. As a result, the actions that Israel would take towards the Arabs and the world community would reflect these two different views. Where, they want to engage their neighbors, yet they do not want to sit passively by and allow them to persecute Jews. In this aspect, one could argue that Kastner trial would change the psychology of Israeli thinking, by highlighting how various incidents of the past are relevant in contemporary society and government.Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now