Verified Document

Interoffice Memorandum Of Law Case: Joe Lee Essay

Interoffice Memorandum of Law Case: Joe Lee Simmons, Appellant v. State of Texas, Appellee

Docket number: 01-07-00543-CR

Office file number

Re: Issue [1] was there evidence of possession of cocaine weighing four or more grams but less than 200 grams given the evidentiary requirements of TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 38.35(d)(1); [2] the validity of a motion to suppress based on the officer's failure to report all offenses committed in his jurisdiction to the magistrate, as required by TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 2.13(b)(3); and [3] the sufficiency of an indictment under TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 28.10.

Facts:

The appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of the State's forensic chemist, who performed a chemical analysis on the controlled substance found in appellant's shirt pocket, because the chemical analysis was not accredited at the time of the analysis; appellant challenges the trial court's denial of his motion to suppress because the State did not show that the arresting officer gave notice to some magistrate of all offenses committed within the officer's jurisdiction as required by TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 2.13(b)(3); and appellant contends that the indictment was insufficient because it contained an amendment, but was not amended in accordance with TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 28.10.

Analysis:

1) It is not sufficient to prove that a defendant had a controlled substance in order to establish possession.

"To prove unlawful possession of a controlled substance, the State must prove that the accused (1) exercised care, custody, control, or management over the contraband, (2) was conscious of his connection with it, and (3) knew what it was."

Reference:

53 TEX. JUR. 3d § 95 Generally; "Possession" Defined (2011-2012).

A forensic analysis of physical evidence and the supporting expert testimony are inadmissible if, when the testing was done, the facility was not duly accredited.

TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 38.35(d)(1) provides that: "Except as provided by Subsection (e), a forensic analysis of physical evidence under this article and expert testimony relating to the evidence are not admissible in a criminal action if, at the time of the analysis, the crime laboratory conducting the analysis was not accredited by the director under...

CODE CRIM. PROC. § 38.5(d)(1) (West 2009).
To preserve error, an objection on appeal has to match the objection made at trial, or if the specific grounds of the objection were apparent from the context of the objection.

Reference:

Guevara v. State, 97 S.W. 3d 579, 583 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003)

TEX. R. APP. R. 33.1(a) (West 2009).

TEX. R. EVID. 103(a)(1) (West 2009).

The State has the burden of establishing that the substance in question was a controlled substance; it is not sufficient for a defendant to believe it was a controlled substance.

The State cannot use testimony from an unaccredited laboratory or by a chemist working at an unaccredited laboratory to establish that a substance is a controlled substance.

The defendant objected to admission of this testimony at trial, but did so based on a broken chain of custody, rather than under TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 38.5(d)(1).

Conclusion:

Although the criminal laboratory evidence that the substance in question was cocaine should not have been admissible at trial, the failure to properly preserve that issue removes it from consideration upon appeal.

2) A defendant can make a motion to suppress based on an officer's failure to comply with the duties defined for him under the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.

An officer is required to report to a magistrate all offenses committed within that officer's jurisdiction.

"The officer shall:(3) give notice to some magistrate of all offenses committed within the officer's jurisdiction, where the officer has good reason to believe there has been a violation of the penal law"

Sources used in this document:
Reference:

TEX. JUR. 3d § 23 Sufficiency of Indictment (2006).

It is the appellant's responsibility to show error on appeal, and if the record fails to show error, then it should be assumed that the trial court acted correctly.

"It is generally presumed on appeal that the court ruled correctly and that the appellant must show error" (Hall v. State, 829 S.W. 2d 407, 410-411).

"It is appellant's burden to not only preserve the alleged error for review, but to present a record of the alleged error sufficient for us to review it and determine if it was error and if so whether the defendant was harmed" (Montoya v. State, 43 S.W.3d 568, 572).
Cite this Document:
Copy Bibliography Citation

Related Documents

Legal Memorandum
Words: 971 Length: 3 Document Type: Term Paper

Legal Memorandum Clara and Charles are seeking to file a lawsuit against the former fiance of Clara, Derek, to whom they accuse of breaching the marriage contract before the execution of the agreement. According to Clara, she and her father Clark have suffered from serious financial and emotional damages because of the ignorant and irresponsible attitude of Derek. Clara claims that she has extensively spent money for the preparation of their

Legal Memorandum Memo To: Judge
Words: 1508 Length: 5 Document Type: Research Paper

(b) A peace officer is justified in using deadly physical force upon another person when and to the extent that he reasonably believes it necessary in order: (1) To make an arrest for a felony or to prevent the escape from custody of a person arrested for a felony, unless the officer knows that the arrest is unauthorized; or (2) To defend himself or a third person from what he reasonably

Legal Memorandum Will Jane Prevail
Words: 1417 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

The adverse effect on the employee must be subjective, as well as objective. Not only must the employee suffer from the harassment, but it is also required that a reasonable person in the shoes of the employee would likely have suffered from such conduct." Id. At 84. While the Dupont case involved a sustained, systematic history of abusive behavior, the Court also found that if the behavior was extreme

Legal Memo
Words: 1075 Length: 3 Document Type: Essay

Legal Memorandum Natalie Attired Unemployment Compensation Claim. STATEMENT OF FACTS The client in this case, Natalie Attired is 23 years of age and is a high school graduate as well as having attended New Mexico State University but dropped out after one year and began waitressing. She has most recently been working for Biddy Baker, 60 years of age who has been in the restaurant business for more than 20 years. Every three

Legal Memo Marshal Mathers in Re: Mr.
Words: 1100 Length: 4 Document Type: Term Paper

Legal Memo MARSHAL MATHERS IN RE: Mr. Sam Witwicky (Our Client) -- Criminal Concealed Weapon Charge The firm's new client, Sam Witwicky, has retained this firm for legal representation in a criminal matter. Mr. Witwicky was arrested on his front lawn for carrying a concealed weapon. The police know Mr. Witwicky from a previous instance in which they were called to the residence of the client. Mr. Witwicky has retained this law firm

Legal Research, Writing, & Analysis
Words: 1611 Length: 6 Document Type: Essay

This chapter is completed with further information on a legal analysis in chapter 12, which discusses the organization of the results of the research. The Honigsberg Grid is amply described as a useful instrument in such an organization. Chapter 13 presents directions as to how a memorandum of law should be written, as well as some of its most important characteristics, notably the fact that this needs to be an

Sign Up for Unlimited Study Help

Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.

Get Started Now