Although the issues addressed on Obama's website are indeed important and critical, their perspective is in my view too general. Romney on the other hand tries to narrow down to the specifics. It is therefore unlikely that any user would feel left out in having his or her issue addressed. Basically, both websites are easy to navigate with the link to the homepage being consistent. Further, in both cases, functionality is enhanced with the clear labeling of each item of functionality. This makes both websites rather user friendly. However, it is much easier in my opinion to contact Romney's campaign team than it is to contact Obama's campaign team. In Obama's website, the user has to scroll all the way to the bottom of the lengthy pages so as to access the contact details. The leaner pages in Romney's website allow the user to easily contact the campaign team with little effort. This gives the user a clear path to the team's information. The elderly vote remains critical for both presidential candidates. The...

I am convinced that the more verbose an individual is in presenting his or her message, the further he or she pushes away this important voter. Hence the need for clarity is critical in this case. On this front, Romney's website comes up tops. Information on this particular website is presented in a brief, summarized and easy to understand format.
Conclusion

In conclusion, I am convinced that in comparison to Obama's website, Romney's website is much more user friendly. The information presented to users in this case is significantly summarized and hence easy to understand. Thus in the final analysis, Romney's website is not only user friendly but also less confusing.

References

Obama for America (2012). Barack Obama. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from: http://www.barackobama.com/

Romney for President, Inc. (2012). Mitt Romney. Retrieved July 24, 2012, from: http://www.mittromney.com/